Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Potential interest in Ned
Collapse
X
-
-
"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
Key word.Where does this idea come from that he is on much lower wages than when he arrived?
His wage was reported as 40-50k a week when he signed, so can't get my head around it dropping by half during his time here. You wouldn't take a 50% paycut in any job, nevermind football when its not difficult to get a move based on reputation.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.Comment
-
"What was that Les, captain? Never mind the £20k a week I'll be missing out on, why didn't you just say! Where do I sign..."
Yeah, c'mon Nas
Comment
-
But we never got suggestions that Ned was on high wages, we just made assumptions based on our situation. Right now, the closest thing we have to proof suggests that he's on 20k at most in terms of basic wages."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
Nas, as for the article you've linked - methinks Ned has slipped under the radar there.
He and Caulker are definitely on more than the majority of the squad.
Only hope that we had the sense to bring Kelvins wage down with a take it or leave it offer last summer as i guess he would've on a nice amount compared to what we offer now.Comment
-
So we're to believe an article that states the squad (not he) is on much lower wages, but not articles from when he signed?Comment
-
That's just an attempt to support an argument though haha, you're more hoping that he's slipped under the radar than actually expecting him to have.Nas, as for the article you've linked - methinks Ned has slipped under the radar there.
He and Caulker are definitely on more than the majority of the squad.
Only hope that we had the sense to bring Kelvins wage down with a take it or leave it offer last summer as i guess he would've on a nice amount compared to what we offer now.
Also Kelvin was signed in our champ season so I doubt he was on more than 25k at any point."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
Comment
-
Your money would go up over time not down!!
Sensible clubs include relegation clauses, pretty sure it was claimed we hadn't. I'd hazard a guess he's on minimum 40k a week.
Personally I'd like to see him move on. Never been that confident in him, hence Nervous Ned. If he stays no probs, handy player to have, but my preference would be to shift him out.
Comment
-
Just got to wait for Ollie to say he hates him and would never of had him anywhere near this club later today and you know he's off.
Comment
Comment