Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Caulker
Collapse
X
-
Would love 8 million but think we would be lucky to get about 2 million, that's if there is another club stupid enough to pay his wagesOriginally posted by maidstone_hoop View Posthttp://www.espn.co.uk/football/socce...ant-to-sign-st
We need to be savy in this window and someone like Caulker offers us a great opportunity to get some decent money in and then reinvest it on a proven striker.
With the money available to prem clubs and Swansea desperate to stay in the league then we should hold firm for 8 mill!!
-
Not in today's market. We will pocket at least 5 mill if we sell Caulker its just whether we will hold a tough stance and use Swansea dire position to our advantage!Originally posted by uptheR's View PostWould love 8 million but think we would be lucky to get about 2 million, that's if there is another club stupid enough to pay his wages
Comment
-
we need to be looking at getting rid of the following.........
perch, ned, sandro, henry, el kyati, gladwin, chery,
and bring in a rightback ( calum paterson from dundee for me)
a attacking midfielder (ravel)
striker (not got a farking clue)
how much that would raise i have no ideansa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
I liked Swansea until they sacked Monk, played well, good players.Originally posted by West Acton View PostCurrent market and there position starting price should be £6mil not a penny less
Is it only me or are others really pleased to see swansealona struggling
They look as woeful as us now but at least they score every now and then.
18 months is long enough to get a decent figure, but has he really shown that he's worth it? Played for England once ages ago and been relegated 3 times. Struggling to think who would want him.
I'd rather keep him and make him captain with Hall as CB pairing.
Loans will have to get us out of this mess as we are NOT going to attract the kind of players we NEED, given our new financial philosophy and current league position.
I'd rather that, get us away from relegation and look toward next season, rather than panic buy in Jan.
We should keep what quality we have.Last edited by topperharley; 28-12-2016, 04:02 PM.
Comment
-
Are you forgetting we have a dof Hove ? If Ollie has the money to play with does that make ### lame duck ?Originally posted by Hove Ranger View PostWe would do well to get 4 million. Plus he's only got 18 months left on his contract so best to cash in asap. Will probably end up being a loan which is fine if they cover all his wages and a decent loan fee. Gives Holloway something to play with and CB is a position we are fairly stacked
Comment
-
Fairly stacked with CB ? Don't we will be saying that Saturday as Hall looks like the only one available, except for the kids.Originally posted by Hove Ranger View PostWe would do well to get 4 million. Plus he's only got 18 months left on his contract so best to cash in asap. Will probably end up being a loan which is fine if they cover all his wages and a decent loan fee. Gives Holloway something to play with and CB is a position we are fairly stacked
Comment
-
We will shift these two big earners but if some have there way we will replace them with others as some were advocating paying Rhodes 60k a week to get him inOriginally posted by winalotto View PostThe last two big earners are Caulker and Sandro if they both go that will help QPR a lot in wages saved , even if they don't command big transfer fees
Comment
Comment