Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

QPR Eye Australian Winger

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shania
    C Club
    • Apr 2010
    • 23697

    #46
    Originally posted by Hitman34
    at the same time?
    Yes.
    QPR
    Best team in the world
    Sort of

    Comment

    • Hitman34
      Platinum Seat
      • Jan 2012
      • 13959

      #47
      Originally posted by Norths
      ######? Assume you mean gladwin who, along with el khat, is nowhere near the standard required as a starter for us in this league.
      In fact, with Pilkington and another wideman likely to come in, i would say el ######s days could be numbered here.
      totally agree with you, ###### is not cut out for this league. personally i would love to go for something more dynamic, leckie on the left and nagkboto on the right with a fast striker to boot.

      the way we seem to be setting up requires pacy attacking minded players on the counter.

      pilkington, el #### and ###### just don't do it for me personally.

      surley there has to be 6-7 mil in the kitty from the sale of fer and philips. just offer 1.5mil for the french lad and the same for the aussie and get it done. 3mil for two fast skillful wingers is good busniess
      nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

      Comment

      • Hitman34
        Platinum Seat
        • Jan 2012
        • 13959

        #48
        oh norths, could you tweet dave mc and ask him if we are still in for nagkboto. i dont have a twitter account so i cannot ask him myself.

        cheers mate.
        nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

        Comment

        • Norths
          CCG
          • Jan 2011
          • 13067

          #49
          Prettt sure he mentioned the other day that we are still keen on him.

          Pilkington has done well in the top two divisions. Shouldn't rank him alongside El Khat and Gladwin.

          Comment

          • klonk
            Silver Seat
            • May 2011
            • 2401

            #50
            Originally posted by Norths

            not happening

            Comment

            • nasser95
              Gold Seat
              • Dec 2012
              • 7216

              #51
              Originally posted by klonk
              Suggestion is wages were high or the transfer fee was too much.
              "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

              Comment

              • hal9thou
                Silver Seat
                • May 2012
                • 4258

                #52
                Originally posted by nasser95
                Suggestion is wages were high or the transfer fee was too much.
                There's going to come a point where a reactionary fiscal policy costs the club dearly.

                You can blow the gaff by being too restrictive as well as too extravagant. As with on the field, balance is needed.

                Comment

                • Southport
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 473

                  #53
                  So he wanted 20k per week and we decided that this is too much?

                  Comment

                  • Hitman34
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 13959

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Southport
                    So he wanted 20k per week and we decided that this is too much?
                    oh well, back to league 2 scouting
                    nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                    Comment

                    • Kevin Mcleod
                      Referee
                      • Aug 2013
                      • 17322

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Southport
                      So he wanted 20k per week and we decided that this is too much?
                      See I can't see that as being true, cos jfh is saying he wants to keep Caulker (who's shite and we don't even need) who's on more wages than that, and he's being allowed to keep him.
                      So why would signing a really good player we actually need on less money be a problem?

                      Comment

                      • Shania
                        C Club
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 23697

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Southport
                        So he wanted 20k per week and we decided that this is too much?
                        Isn“t 20k what we pay them now?
                        QPR
                        Best team in the world
                        Sort of

                        Comment

                        • nanocopic
                          Silver Seat
                          • Oct 2015
                          • 1725

                          #57
                          It isn't 20k converted, it's 27.5k probably actually £30k he wanted and also I won't entirely trust a site I've never heard of is printing the whole truth.

                          Comment

                          • BFG
                            • Jul 2016
                            • 120

                            #58
                            Sometimes not all spending is bad.

                            Comment

                            Working...