Would you give him some game time on Saturday, just as a final farewell to the crowd? Am pretty sure he needs more than 1 more game to trigger that contract clause.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Rob Green
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Whatever anyone says, he's been a good servant to the Club so I wouldn't be averse to it. However, it's all about the future so would much prefer to continue the policy where Smithies is No.1 and having an extended holiday whilst Ingrahm continues to deputise and get games under his belt#standuptocancer
#inyourfacecancerComment
-
Whatever anyone says, he's been a good servant to the Club so I wouldn't be averse to it. However, it's all about the future so would much prefer to continue the policy where Smithies is No.1 and having an extended holiday whilst Ingrahm continues to deputise and get games under his belt
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.Comment
-
Whatever anyone says, he's been a good servant to the Club so I wouldn't be averse to it. However, it's all about the future so would much prefer to continue the policy where Smithies is No.1 and having an extended holiday whilst Ingrahm continues to deputise and get games under his belt
Comment
-
No. If he wanted to play do badly he could have waved the clause as he knew QPR were fonancially struggling. He has been a good servant but he isnt blameless in this situation and sure as hell should not be playing again.He wasnt that good a servant to deserve a special game.Comment
-
Knowing our luck we will have counted up games wrong he will play and we will get lumbered with gutless for another season so it's a no from me he's doing just fine and causing no damage on the training pitchComment
-
No, why play Green when we have two goalies who are not only a real talent but one of them will leave if they don't get enough game time, play Ingram againComment
-
Comment