Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

One up top don't suit us

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • West Acton
    CCG
    • Dec 2009
    • 21475

    #1

    One up top don't suit us

    Harry brought it in and it's been a disaster. Bin it and back to basics this is not working

    It might be old and frowned upon but players know how to play 442 and think it suits players we have more. Enough f u King about back to basics
  • maidstone_hoop
    Gold Seat
    • May 2009
    • 6718

    #2
    Originally posted by West Acton
    Harry brought it in and it's been a disaster. Bin it and back to basics this is not working

    It might be old and frowned upon but players know how to play 442 and think it suits players we have more. Enough f u King about back to basics

    100% agree west. Back to basics and let's build from the back. Get two decent wingers and 2 decent strikers and we will have a good platform to build on.

    Comment

    • West Acton
      CCG
      • Dec 2009
      • 21475

      #3
      Maids we have tried it and it's been a total disaster like banging head Against a brick wall but we go out game after game thinking it's going to get better

      Comment

      • QPR Rickson
        Silver Seat
        • May 2012
        • 1527

        #4
        Going nowhere with this 1 upfront pony. Results have proved the fact. Disgusting performances.

        Comment

        • James1979
          Silver Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 4857

          #5
          I agree west. But as much as I dislike Harry, we can't blame him for fact that the 3 after him have all done the same. They should pick formation that they think works for squad available.

          Comment

          • QPR Richard
            Gold Seat
            • Sep 2011
            • 6489

            #6
            Cue all the fans of "number ten roles" getting the hump 😉
            Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

            Comment

            • Fordy
              Silver Seat
              • May 2011
              • 4281

              #7
              I hate the 2 sitting players. Basically playing with 2 defensive midfielders, no drive, no goals from midfield. Teams like arsenal can play it because they have quality full backs who attack and midfielders like Ramsey who break from midfield and score goals.

              Comment

              • Rangers77
                Platinum Seat
                • Aug 2012
                • 11808

                #8
                Such common sense, West. The fact that Jimmy the Genius brought on a left back as his third sub (a freaking left back!!!!!) rather than going two up makes me think he hasn't a f acking clue.

                Comment

                • Rangers77
                  Platinum Seat
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 11808

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Fordy
                  I hate the 2 sitting players. Basically playing with 2 defensive midfielders, no drive, no goals from midfield. Teams like arsenal can play it because they have quality full backs who attack and midfielders like Ramsey who break from midfield and score goals.
                  This. Times a million.

                  Comment

                  • QPR Richard
                    Gold Seat
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 6489

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Fordy
                    I hate the 2 sitting players. Basically playing with 2 defensive midfielders, no drive, no goals from midfield. Teams like arsenal can play it because they have quality full backs who attack and midfielders like Ramsey who break from midfield and score goals.
                    We've got "quality" full backs too, poor quality full backs...
                    Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                    Comment

                    • James1979
                      Silver Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 4857

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Rangers77
                      This. Times a million.
                      And 1. No drive from our midfield this season.

                      Comment

                      • brightonr
                        Banned
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 10922

                        #12
                        In fairness Wests, it IS slightly better than the recent NONE UP FRONT experiments.

                        Comment

                        • West Acton
                          CCG
                          • Dec 2009
                          • 21475

                          #13
                          Originally posted by brightonr
                          In fairness Wests, it IS slightly better than the recent NONE UP FRONT experiments.
                          Same result

                          Comment

                          • Rangers77
                            Platinum Seat
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 11808

                            #14
                            Originally posted by brightonr
                            In fairness Wests, it IS slightly better than the recent NONE UP FRONT experiments.

                            Comment

                            • maverick69
                              Silver Seat
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 2029

                              #15
                              If anything - it's getting all players back on a "representative" wage IMHO. We've long been seen as a "tool for filthy wealth".

                              I think we're in for a lot more pain before it gets better.

                              Comment

                              Working...