Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

I think Les.......

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • Kurt Bakholt
    Apprentice
    • Jan 2014
    • 62
    #31
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
    I keep asking cos it baffles me so much, if 15 million is under value why hasnt anyone bought him? Can you explain please if you are determined hes to cheap ?
    Because we valued him too low. If we'd valued him at 25m someone would have bid 20m by now. After all villa put a price of 32m on Benteke and someone paid it in the end. After all he has a better scoring record than all but 3 premier league strikers, and a better injury record than Aguero, Costa, Benteke and Kane.

      Comment

      • nasser95
        Gold Seat
        • Dec 2012
        • 7216
        #32
        Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
        I know what i would like to see to get a bit of a gauge, a list of prem clubs that would have to smash their all time highest transfer record to buy charlie. Maybe nasser would be so kind.
        Gladly, will look onto it right now.
        "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

          Comment

          • nasser95
            Gold Seat
            • Dec 2012
            • 7216
            #33
            Teams who would break their Transfer record signing charlie in the premier league:

            Bournemouth (Mings 7.91mil); Crystal Palace (Cabaye 9.73mil); Leicester City (Okazaki 7.70mil); Norwich City (Van Wolfswinkel 7.00mil); Southampton (Ramirez 10.64mil); Stoke City (Shaqiri 11.90mil); Sunderland (Gyan 11.20mil); Swansea (Bony 9.73mil); Watford (Capoue 6.73mil); West Brom (Rondon 11.90mil); West Ham (Carroll 12.25mil)

            Data Courtesy of transfermarkt.co.uk
            "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

              Comment

              • Kevin Mcleod
                Referee
                • Aug 2013
                • 17322
                #34
                Cheers mate, really interesting.....see most of them will have to really go up a gear in transfer spending to bring in charlie. Hes not cheap to the sort of clubs who would buy him, hes cheap in terms of monies spent to the big clubs but they dont seem to deem him good enough.

                  Comment

                  • nasser95
                    Gold Seat
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 7216
                    #35
                    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
                    Cheers mate, really interesting.....see most of them will have to really go up a gear in transfer spending to bring in charlie. Hes not cheap to the sort of clubs who would buy him, hes cheap in terms of monies spent to the big clubs but they dont seem to deem him good enough.
                    I think we have priced him really intelligently, its above the range for the lower to mid quality sides and the sides above that wouldn't consider him a luxurious enough signing. Only managers I can see going in for him to be honest are Sherwood and Pocchetino
                    "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

                      Comment

                      Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                      Working...