Playing Style?

[Ramsey is god]

No doubt i am in the minority here, but i don't really care what "style" we play. As much as i hate them, i thought watching Chelsea completely kill a game at 1-0 last season was actually entertaining and think anyone who really loves football can appreciate any style that results in you winning.

All about results for me and given the choice between watching Arsenal pass the ball across the box back and forth or Stoke launching the ball into the area at every opportunity, i would take the latter.

[Midgeyboy]

[QUOTE=Lube Me;1452589 i thought watching Chelsea completely kill a game at 1-0 last season was actually entertaining[/QUOTE]

#### off!

[bakes8]

#### off!

Seconded.

[Ramsey is god]

HaHa, i meant in a, you can appreciate what they are doing, type thing

[bakes8]

HaHa, i meant in a, you can appreciate what they are doing, type thing

Not really. I think Chelsea and even hate Chelsea.

Delighted they got anally probed by a proper football side yesterday.

[Ramsgate Hoop]

One of the highlights of pre season for me, was we looked to play the ball out from the back. I even started a thread on it.

That's gone completely to pot the first 2 games, and it's like even though he's not at our club anymore, we're lookign for Bobby Zamora to hold the ball up.

[Ramsey is god]

Not really. I think Chelsea and even hate Chelsea.

Delighted they got anally probed by a proper football side yesterday.

funny, I find Man City the most boring side in english football to watch.

[Midgeyboy]

funny, I find Man City the most boring side in english football to watch.

Jose? Is that you?

[Ramsey is god]

Jose? Is that you?

IT WAS A FAKE RESULT I AM TELLING YOU!

[upperloft]

No doubt i am in the minority here, but i don't really care what "style" we play. As much as i hate them, i thought watching Chelsea completely kill a game at 1-0 last season was actually entertaining and think anyone who really loves football can appreciate any style that results in you winning.

All about results for me and given the choice between watching Arsenal pass the ball across the box back and forth or Stoke launching the ball into the area at every opportunity, i would take the latter.

I wouldn't really care, but we're playing #### and still not getting results.

[Midgeyboy]

IT WAS A FAKE RESULT I AM TELLING YOU!

Sorry.. just seen the Lube Man name, it is you, welcome Jose.

[bakes8]

funny, I find Man City the most boring side in english football to watch.

Really?

Personally I think any Qpr fan that enjoys watching Chelsea grind out 1-0 wins is shopping in the wrong Supermarket.

[Ramsey is god]

Really?

Personally I think any Qpr fan that enjoys watching Chelsea grind out 1-0 wins is shopping in the wrong Supermarket.

completely missing the point that i am making. ok, lets all try to pass like Barcelona then

[AlamoR]

I made very similar comments as the original poster (don't know how to post their comments) under "What positive has Ramsey brought?". From style to tactics to younger players there are none. He is all talk and way out of his depth. Again, his body of work is not 2 games this season, it dates back to last season and it is woeful. QPR are sunk with him in charge.

[Stanley]

Charlie Austin needs a big man up front to help him which is why we should be paying two up top!

I disagree.

What Charlie Austin needs is too good traditional wingers who know how to whip balls into dangerous areas for him to get on the end of.

That's his strength and what he's always thrived on throughout his career.

That's how he always scored most of his goals pre-QPR.

Kevin Gallen said exactly the same.

Aint rocket science. Feed him correctly and he scores goals.