Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Matt Lowton..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tarbie
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 8542

    #31
    Originally posted by QprQpr
    All the other teams that changed managers stayed up
    All the other teams that changed manager did it before or during the transfer window and improved their squads in January.

    Comment

    • QprQpr
      Wealdstone Raider
      • Jan 2014
      • 1106

      #32
      Originally posted by Tarbie
      All the other teams that changed manager did it before or during the transfer window and improved their squads in January.
      So your passing the blame Fernándes now. On paper our squad was strong enough to stay up. Our problem was the two shite managers we had leading the team.

      Comment

      • Tarbie
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 8542

        #33
        Originally posted by QprQpr
        So your passing the blame Fernándes now. On paper our squad was strong enough to stay up. Our problem was the two shite managers we had leading the team.
        Wasn't blaming anyone but if we have to apportion blame I think you need to look at Harry and the board before Ramsey. Clearly we probably won't agree on this but I think the approach we have going into this season is a lot more positive and sensible for a club or our size than any of the 4 previous seasons under Fernandes!

        Comment

        • dogsrrs
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2013
          • 6671

          #34
          Originally posted by Tarbie
          Fair enough. But the fact remains that the damage was done far before Ramsey took charge. In my opinion Ramsey deserves a chance to prove himself with his own squad and I really don't see the point of getting on his back based on less than 20 games last season.

          I also don't buy into the point the Wealdstone Raider was making that Paul Clement would have been a far superior appointment than Ramsey. Both are unknown quantities and both could go either way. For the record I would have gladly had Clement here. By the same token I'm not disappointed by the appointment of Ramsey permanently.
          Yes yes and yes to your points CR divides opinions I'm sure at least 90%of Ramsey doubters wish him well now he has the job and would love a large slice of humble pie , but for an equal split many of us feel justified in seeing a lack of positivity in his appointment

          Comment

          • QprQpr
            Wealdstone Raider
            • Jan 2014
            • 1106

            #35
            Originally posted by Tarbie
            Wasn't blaming anyone but if we have to apportion blame I think you need to look at Harry and the board before Ramsey. Clearly we probably won't agree on this but I think the approach we have going into this season is a lot more positive and sensible for a club or our size than any of the 4 previous seasons under Fernandes!
            I'm not questioning our approach to signings etc. My issue is why ramsey was given the job in the first place. He had a worse record than redknapp and sent us down no two ways about that.

            I'd be interested to hear what you think the pros and cons of his appointment was as I'm really struggling to find 1 pro for his appointment right now

            Comment

            • Tarbie
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 8542

              #36
              Originally posted by QprQpr
              I'm not questioning our approach to signings etc. My issue is why ramsey was given the job in the first place. He had a worse record than redknapp and sent us down no two ways about that.

              I'd be interested to hear what you think the pros and cons of his appointment was as I'm really struggling to find 1 pro for his appointment right now
              Ok, my pro's for Ramsey are as follows:

              1.) He has had the respect of the whole squad from day one (if you believe what you read). This is something that Harry & Hughes never managed to achieve (again, if you believe what you read).
              2.) He tries to play good football.
              3.) He's not afraid to drop big names in favour of younger players if he thinks that is what is required.
              4.) He has gone on record a number of times saying that he is looking to develop younger players and improve them. This is is something that Harry was neither interested in, or capable of.
              5.) He's very well respected in the coaching world.
              6.) This one is personal to me. I like the bloke and think he speaks a lot of sense.
              7.) He has something to prove.

              Of course there are a healthy amount of cons too but I'd still take Ramsey over a lot of the established managers that we could have attracted.

              Comment

              • Ginger Ninja
                W12 Seat
                • Jan 2010
                • 17458

                #37
                Regarding point 2, we definitely played better football under Ramsey than we ever did under Redknapp. Our problem was a p!ss poor defence. Agree with the rest Tarbie.
                Top Scorers 2018/2019

                Nakhi Wells - 8
                Pawel Wszolek - 6
                Luke Freeman - 6
                Matt Smith - 6
                Ebere Eze - 4
                Joel Lynch - 3
                Tomer Hemed - 3
                Toni Leistner - 2
                Massimo Luongo- 2
                Angel Rangel - 2
                Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
                Geoff Cameron - 1
                Aramide Oteh - 1
                Jake Bidwell - 1
                Jordan Cousins - 1

                Summer Transfers 2019

                IN


                OUT

                Comment

                • QprQpr
                  Wealdstone Raider
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 1106

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Tarbie
                  Ok, my pro's for Ramsey are as follows:

                  1.) He has had the respect of the whole squad from day one (if you believe what you read). This is something that Harry & Hughes never managed to achieve (again, if you believe what you read).
                  2.) He tries to play good football.
                  3.) He's not afraid to drop big names in favour of younger players if he thinks that is what is required.
                  4.) He has gone on record a number of times saying that he is looking to develop younger players and improve them. This is is something that Harry was neither interested in, or capable of.
                  5.) He's very well respected in the coaching world.
                  6.) This one is personal to me. I like the bloke and think he speaks a lot of sense.
                  7.) He has something to prove.

                  Of course there are a healthy amount of cons too but I'd still take Ramsey over a lot of the established managers that we could have attracted.
                  1, 2, , 5 , 6, 7 are debatable Hiring a manager based on " his a nice bloke " is frankly laughable mate.

                  1 is invalid anyway as unless your a player in the team how would you know whether his respected or not? The fact that certain players refused to play for him tells me he isn't respected.

                  I take your point on the other 2 you listed out of the 7 !

                  Happy to list his cons but I'd probably exceed the character limit on a post...
                  Last edited by QprQpr; 20-06-2015, 06:09 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Tarbie
                    Gold Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 8542

                    #39
                    Originally posted by QprQpr
                    1, 2, , 5 , 6, 7 are debatable Hiring a manager based on " his a nice bloke " is frankly laughable mate.

                    1 is invalid anyway as unless your a player in the team how would you know whether his respected or not? The fact that certain players refused to play for him tells me he isn't respected.

                    I take your point on the other 2 you listed out of the 7 !

                    Happy to list his cons but I'd probably exceed the character limit on a post...
                    It's all about opinions isn't it mate? I do think your outlook is a bit negative though.

                    The one thing that isn't debatable is the fact he is our manager for the foreseeable, he's been given a 3 year contract. In my opinion that means he deserves our backing going into the new season. I'm hopeful that my positive outlook on things isn't misguided and that you and Dogrrs are in for a pleasant surprise!

                    Comment

                    • QprQpr
                      Wealdstone Raider
                      • Jan 2014
                      • 1106

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Tarbie
                      It's all about opinions isn't it mate? I do think your outlook is a bit negative though.

                      The one thing that isn't debatable is the fact he is our manager for the foreseeable, he's been given a 3 year contract. In my opinion that means he deserves our backing going into the new season. I'm hopeful that my positive outlook on things isn't misguided and that you and Dogrrs are in for a pleasant surprise!
                      I hope he does well mate but the jury is out on him.

                      Comment

                      • Shepherds Mush
                        Platinum Seat
                        • Nov 2012
                        • 10325

                        #41
                        Originally posted by QprQpr
                        All the other teams that changed managers stayed up
                        All the other teams had much better squads than ours before a ball was kicked last season.

                        Comment

                        • Hitman34
                          Platinum Seat
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 13959

                          #42
                          Originally posted by QprQpr
                          So your passing the blame Fernándes now. On paper our squad was strong enough to stay up. Our problem was the two shite managers we had leading the team.
                          well said ray
                          nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                          Comment

                          Working...