Man City bid £40 mil for sterling

[Awin]

QPR related due to sell on

[Ranger]

Also if they come in for CA then surly 20mil +

[MattyRangers]

Easiest £8m we've ever made probably our top 3 fees received for a player and he ain't even ours

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

And Paladini although an inept clown got hammered for not doing more to hold on to Sterling who we sold for £600k, he pulled a great move inserting that clause. £8.6m for a player who never played once for us is pretty impressive stuff. Could even rise another million if Liverpool dig their heels in.

Almost £31m for Austin, Phillips and Sterling. Nice.

[Burnside]

What is our cut?

[MYU]

And Paladini although an inept clown got hammered for not doing more to hold on to Sterling who we sold for £600k, he pulled a great move inserting that clause. £8.6m for a player who never played once for us is pretty impressive stuff. Could even rise another million if Liverpool dig their heels in.

Almost £31m for Austin, Phillips and Sterling. Nice.

Very true, most will remain silent I bet. Think Liverpool are holding out for 45 to 50k, let's hope so.

We must have at least 20% on that sale.

[maidstone_hoop]

Apparently it's 25% according to paldini a few weeks ago.

No wonder Liverpool are holding on for 50 mill.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

Apparently it's 25% according to paldini a few weeks ago.

No wonder Liverpool are holding on for 50 mill.

Are them clauses for one transfer only? What if he moved again?

[maidstone_hoop]

Are them clauses for one transfer only? What if he moved again?

Don't know mate. I presume just the one move but you never know.

But if city get him atm we could be looking at between 10-12.5 mill in the bank which certainly helps with the debts and should allow us to spend a little bit more of the money we get for players like Charlie or fer

[Pie & mash]

Before anyone starts with the "any proof for the sell-on clause other than his word". Ian Taylor confirmed its existence the other day

[maidstone_hoop]

Before anyone starts with the "any proof for the sell-on clause other than his word". Ian Taylor confirmed its existence the other day

What did he say merry, I didn't see it?

[jmelanie]

I know this is the Daily Fail but it sounds accurate

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3089467/Raheem-Sterling-sell-clause-QPR-pocket-12-5m-Liverpool-allow-England-winger-leave-summer.html

[stanistheman]

hopefully Liverpool will sell him soon, so that QPR can keep hold of Phillips (if he is inclined to stay).

[Garyd73]

If he goes for that sort of money the terms will dictate it is paid over a period of time, transfer fees aren't paid in one lump sum. I don't know if this means we get our payment in a similar manner or not but there is no guarantee of an instant windfall of cash.

[MYU]

If he goes for that sort of money the terms will dictate it is paid over a period of time, transfer fees aren't paid in one lump sum. I don't know if this means we get our payment in a similar manner or not but there is no guarantee of an instant windfall of cash.

We tell them them we want it up front or we'll charge interest.