Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Leroy Fer
Collapse
X
-
It would've been fine but for stupid squad planning in not eyeing up a replacement as inevitable he would go due to the bargain release clause he had.
Without that clause his value would've increased from a successful season at Newcastle, so we'd have either made more money, or kept as no takers at a truer market value.Comment
-
You could also argue that without that clause he probably wouldn't have signed for usIt would've been fine but for stupid squad planning in not eyeing up a replacement as inevitable he would go due to the bargain release clause he had.
Without that clause his value would've increased from a successful season at Newcastle, so we'd have either made more money, or kept as no takers at a truer market value.Comment
-
i strongly disagree.
Had Fer been in the side throughout Ramsey's time in charge I believe QPR would have. got a few more wins, especially against Everton and West Ham. Who knows they might habe got a few draws at home too. That would have been more than enough to stay up
The games QPR lost were very close and having Fer and Vargas available could have been the difference between winning and drawing instead of losing.Comment
-
Steady. If he was he wouldn't have QPR, Norwich, and back to back relagations on his CV. Good enough for premiership clubs 10th and below imo. No way would he play for Chelsea, United, City, etc.
Anyone know if he is playing tomorrow or been called up for the game against USA?@chrisrobson9Comment
-
Fer is by far our best midfielder. I rate matty phillips but fer for me should be playing in the premier. Can't blame our relegation season on him as if he was fit and played with vargas I think the league would of looked v differentI played sunday league football today.
Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.
I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.
We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!Comment
Comment