Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

UEFA to relax FFP rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ginger Ninja
    W12 Seat
    • Jan 2010
    • 17458

    #1

    UEFA to relax FFP rules



    I'm not sure how, if at all, this could affect us, just thought I would share.
    Top Scorers 2018/2019

    Nakhi Wells - 8
    Pawel Wszolek - 6
    Luke Freeman - 6
    Matt Smith - 6
    Ebere Eze - 4
    Joel Lynch - 3
    Tomer Hemed - 3
    Toni Leistner - 2
    Massimo Luongo- 2
    Angel Rangel - 2
    Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
    Geoff Cameron - 1
    Aramide Oteh - 1
    Jake Bidwell - 1
    Jordan Cousins - 1

    Summer Transfers 2019

    IN


    OUT
  • vespa
    Gang of Four Members
    • Mar 2011
    • 6903

    #2
    Platini says FFP will be relaxed

    Just heard on Talksport ,the headline "Platini says Financial Fair Play rules to be relaxed " ,they didnt say any more than that ,except which ever one of Hawkesby and Jacobs ,that supports chelsea moaning about it .( surprise surprise )
    Anyone know anymore and how it can effect us ?
    Rangers,Scooters ,Tunes and Trainers

    Comment

    • Ginger Ninja
      W12 Seat
      • Jan 2010
      • 17458

      #3
      Top Scorers 2018/2019

      Nakhi Wells - 8
      Pawel Wszolek - 6
      Luke Freeman - 6
      Matt Smith - 6
      Ebere Eze - 4
      Joel Lynch - 3
      Tomer Hemed - 3
      Toni Leistner - 2
      Massimo Luongo- 2
      Angel Rangel - 2
      Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
      Geoff Cameron - 1
      Aramide Oteh - 1
      Jake Bidwell - 1
      Jordan Cousins - 1

      Summer Transfers 2019

      IN


      OUT

      Comment

      • dogsrrs
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2013
        • 6671

        #4
        Originally posted by Ginger Ninja
        http://www.itv.com/news/2015-05-18/u...ed-next-month/

        I'm not sure how, if at all, this could affect us, just thought I would share.
        Well it's a yard stick to argue our case and great that it will come into effect before the Transfer window opens

        Comment

        • Bluehoop
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 9258

          #5
          Also just heard this headline and wondered the same thing. If even the most arrogant of Frenchmen is accepting it will be relaxed, it really supports my ongoing theory that it is unworkable in law - and therefore somewhat shambolic of the powers that be to seek to enforce it
          #standuptocancer
          #inyourfacecancer

          Comment

          • The Merry Ploughboy
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 3233

            #6
            QPRs lawyers will tear through the ruling, small fine, no embargo, nothing to see here
            Papers all talking bowlarks
            Let's enjoy the championship
            From the Hills of Kerry
            To the streets of Free Derry

            Comment

            • maidstone_hoop
              Gold Seat
              • May 2009
              • 6718

              #7
              Small fine (a few mil) no where near the 10s of millions being quoted. Embargo is a realistic possibility as this was what Nottingham Forrest and Leeds received under the new regulations.

              As said before there is a British law which means the football league can't charge us on the old rules which all the papers and pundits keeps suggesting. We will be charged under the current football league rules which means the consequences are a lot less severe.

              Biggest worry would be a embargo but this might not come into play until January 215 which would mean we would have the summer to sort ourselves out and recruit. A smallish fine and transfer ban in jan wouldn't be the worst case scenario.

              Comment

              • The Merry Ploughboy
                Silver Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 3233

                #8
                ^^^^
                For someone from Kent you speak a lot of sense
                From the Hills of Kerry
                To the streets of Free Derry

                Comment

                • Ginger Ninja
                  W12 Seat
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 17458

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Merry Ploughboy
                  QPRs lawyers will tear through the ruling, small fine, no embargo, nothing to see here
                  Papers all talking bowlarks
                  Let's enjoy the championship
                  That would be awesome and I hope you're right Merry.
                  Top Scorers 2018/2019

                  Nakhi Wells - 8
                  Pawel Wszolek - 6
                  Luke Freeman - 6
                  Matt Smith - 6
                  Ebere Eze - 4
                  Joel Lynch - 3
                  Tomer Hemed - 3
                  Toni Leistner - 2
                  Massimo Luongo- 2
                  Angel Rangel - 2
                  Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
                  Geoff Cameron - 1
                  Aramide Oteh - 1
                  Jake Bidwell - 1
                  Jordan Cousins - 1

                  Summer Transfers 2019

                  IN


                  OUT

                  Comment

                  • brightonr
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10922

                    #10
                    After the last few years under Redknapp and Hughes, a transfer ban would be more of a blessing than a punishment.

                    Comment

                    • Hove Ranger
                      Silver Seat
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 4441

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Bluehoop
                      Also just heard this headline and wondered the same thing. If even the most arrogant of Frenchmen is accepting it will be relaxed, it really supports my ongoing theory that it is unworkable in law - and therefore somewhat shambolic of the powers that be to seek to enforce it
                      Tbf this "theory" has been banded around the media for a couple of seasons now

                      Comment

                      • West Acton
                        CCG
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 21475

                        #12
                        Originally posted by maidstone_hoop
                        As said before there is a British law which means the football league can't charge us on the old rules which all the papers and pundits keeps suggesting. We will be charged under the current football league rules which means the consequences are a lot less severe..
                        This bit is interesting and welcome maids where have you heard it??

                        Comment

                        • maidstone_hoop
                          Gold Seat
                          • May 2009
                          • 6718

                          #13
                          Originally posted by West Acton
                          This bit is interesting and welcome maids where have you heard it??
                          http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...er-levied.html

                          Have a look at this west.

                          This is actually the law in England when it comes to regulations. It's called the lex mitior rule and basically means that company's or in our case a club must be charged on what now is the most lenient version of the rules.

                          This is what our club lawyers are pursuing. Most pundits and reporters know about it but are choosing to ignore it as the old story is a much bigger debate and newsworthy. However a lot of creditable journalists have been talking about this for a long time.

                          About 2 weeks ago a sports lawyer was on talk sport on the late night show and he said the way the club have handled the finances and published them is a joke but he also said he very much doubts the football league can uphold any major fine they try to impose on us due to this rule.

                          He explained it saying that under the old regulations the charges against us would be the equivalent of life in prison with no parole but the new charges is like getting a slap on the wrist and at worst a bit of community service.

                          We all know the football league changed the rules, as they themselves said the financial constraints clubs who were relegated from the prem league to the championship had to operate under to meet the ffp were unworkable. now they have done this and new regulations are in place it's going to be impossible for them to uphold charges based on the old regulations. Meaning the fine that's being banded around is a load of rubbish. The new rules are much more lenient to clubs relegated from the prem.
                          Last edited by maidstone_hoop; 18-05-2015, 06:09 PM.

                          Comment

                          • easthertsr
                            Silver Seat
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 1028

                            #14
                            I think we will be OK ,a top lawyer could drive a coach and horses through this stuff it makes no sense and could cost the Football League a huge amount in costs. I know Tony is not everyone's cup of tea but I think he will stand by us and despite everything I think we will be in the mix this time next year!

                            Comment

                            • West Acton
                              CCG
                              • Dec 2009
                              • 21475

                              #15
                              Originally posted by maidstone_hoop
                              http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...er-levied.html

                              Have a look at this west.

                              This is actually the law in England when it comes to regulations. It's called the lex mitior rule and basically means that company's or in our case a club must be charged on what now is the most lenient version of the rules.

                              This is what our club lawyers are pursuing. Most pundits and reporters know about it but are choosing to ignore it as the old story is a much bigger debate and newsworthy. However a lot of creditable journalists have been talking about this for a long time.

                              About 2 weeks ago a sports lawyer was on talk sport on the late night show and he said the way the club have handled the finances and published them is a joke but he also said he very much doubts the football league can uphold any major fine they try to impose on us due to this rule.

                              He explained it saying that under the old regulations the charges against us would be the equivalent of life in prison with no parole but the new charges is like getting a slap on the wrist and at worst a bit of community service.

                              We all know the football league changed the rules, as they themselves said the financial constraints clubs who were relegated from the prem league to the championship had to operate under to meet the ffp were unworkable. now they have done this and new regulations are in place it's going to be impossible for them to uphold charges based on the old regulations. Meaning the fine that's being banded around is a load of rubbish. The new rules are much more lenient to clubs relegated from the prem.
                              Best thing I have read on here in sometime

                              Comment

                              Working...