Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Austin or Bony?
Collapse
X
-
-
When Austin does it season after season in the premier league, i will class him as good as Bony but until then, its a big statement to make.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
For me the more hard working Brits in the team the betterI blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley BowlesComment
-
Chaz is playing as main striker. Bony is 3rd choice striker at City. Makes a big difference.
Plus, modern strikers can't be judged purely on goals, they need to link up play and get the team going. That's what makes players like Suarez, Benzema, Lewandoski, Ibra the best no. 9s in the world and on a different level to the likes of Rooney, Hernandez, and strikers that score goals but do little else for the team.Comment
-
Bony is betterUnder Les Ferdinand:
Luke Freeman, top assists in the league: 4million
Alex Smithies, great goalie for this club: 3,5million
Charlie Austin, 19 Premier League goals: 4million
Jack Robinson: Contract ran out, left for free
And many more mistakes
LES FERDINAND, IT'S TIME TO GOComment
-
Ha ha, I've got my "17 goals and 4th top scorer in the Premier League" glasses on!
Interesting debate anyway. I know that Bony is a more "complete" player but I think Charlie is a better pure poacher. Depends what you want really but I also think people underestimate Charlie's contribution other than goals. I remember him clearing the ball off our line in one match and I think his contribution up front other than goals is a lot more than people are implying.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.Comment
-
Are you comparing Austin to Klose? Not having that.C'Mon You Supaaaa!!Comment

Comment