Real shame. Thought he had a chance
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
No Austin in England Squad
Collapse
X
-
I may be the only one who suggest this but maybe he should be there alongside them... 5 strikers isn't uncommon and it makes more sense then taking Luke Shaw there."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
The only person the press on twitter are saying is unlucky to miss out is danny ings. No mention of austin whatosever.Originally posted by nasser95 View PostI may be the only one who suggest this but maybe he should be there alongside them... 5 strikers isn't uncommon and it makes more sense then taking Luke Shaw there.
Comment
-
Welbeck has done naff all this year, scored 3 league goals hasn't he?Originally posted by vblockranger View PostWouldnt take the place of any of the strikers picked tho ...Kane/Rooney/Sturridge/Welbeck
That said, I am glad Charlie isn't in the squad (from a selfish point of view).You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
Dont forget that England play with 1 central striker and with sterling, walcott and townsend also in the squad the forward positions are pretty well covered.Originally posted by nasser95 View PostI may be the only one who suggest this but maybe he should be there alongside them... 5 strikers isn't uncommon and it makes more sense then taking Luke Shaw there.
Comment
SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!
Comment