Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Phil Beard Resigns.
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
But i thought Harry was a charlatan and it wasnt the boards fault he so under performed? lol cant have it both ways...or i guess you can if you can convince yourself
Comment
-
I'm not going to lie, I thought Harry coming here was the right thing at the time as did so many including Amit.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Does this mean we think we've lost the argument over new stadium at OAC?Tony Fernandes Blue N White ArmyComment
-
Comment
-
I think you'll find the debt is owned by the shareholders, not banks. Who's going to buy the club with debt? They won't be selling anytime soon.
And if they do, you get to realise your life's ambition, chief bucket supervisor
Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.Comment
-
Heeeeeerrrrreeeee we go again.. I think most just feel its slightly harsh to absolutely vilify someone who is trying to do their best and has their heart in the right place... As well as running a multi-million pound airline.Comment
-
The club isn't being put into debt. The debt is to the shareholders who have given assurances that it's at their own personal risk, not the club's. So if/when they ever leave, any outstanding debt would be written off by them (or paid off, as in the case of the £27m Barclays loan) and not passed on to the club.
The above is not my personal take but what the owners themselves have stated, a statement which they can be held accountable for. So isn't it about time this myth was destroyed about the debt being to QPR FC ?Comment
-
Comment

Comment