Tony's statement is neutral regarding achievment but he's got his point across
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Message from TF
Collapse
X
-
OK he has brought in a lot of triffic players - but where is the TEAMAlso, I'm not sure where all this rubbish that Harry spunks money comes from?
Here's a complete list of permanent signings:
Nelsen, Remy, Yun, Samba, Jenas, Simpson, Dunne, Henry, Austin, O'Neil, Phillips, Chevanton, Onyewu, Benayoun, Donaldson, Hughes, Ferdinand, Caulker, Mutch, Fer, Robinson, McCarthy, Sandro and Manning.
How many of them did people complain about at the time? Hindsight is a wonderful things isn't it!
Loans:
Townsend, BAE, Carroll, Kranjcar, Dellatorre, Doyle, Keane, Maiga, Morrison, Isla, Vargas and Zarate.
Notice how the shite players are the ones signed on free transfers generally, when the board refused to back him last season. Has Harry got the best out of them? No, but that's down to his management skills not buying rubbish. If his management skills are lacking which the majority think is true then surely it's up to our board to get rid of him?
I'm sick of people posting drivel on here when it's simply not true. I'm not defending the job he's done in terms of managing the team but in terms of bringing players in, I find it embarrassing people are having a pop when at the time of signing they were delighted! As I said above, if he's not up to it in management terms the blame lies with the owners for sticking by him.Comment
-
Can't recall the boy from Huddersfield he's on a season long loan and can only come back if the loanee club is prepared to release him which they are not, we should have enough agree with T.F totallyComment
-
Complete waste of time with saggy chops in charge, we had the relegation & rebuild last time all we got was mind numbingly boring football & the luck of the Irish to go up."Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
For us that would mean around 29k."
QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pmComment
-
Big tones always 6 months behind before he twigs what's happening. Cost us last time aswell with sparklessComment
-
Comment
-
Too right, well done Tony.
He bought everybody Harry wanted in the summer, it's down to Harry to get them playing - that's what he is paid £3m a year to do!!You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.Comment
-
Comment
-
Harry is making an appearance at a gambling exhibition in olympia today which is just round the corner from HQ... who knows he could be heading to the ground after to talk to tony... or he may just stay at the betting show and talk about horses ahaComment
-
We've effectively spent 15 million a season over the four years the board has been here, despite spending three of them in the most lucrative league in the world. You think that's backing our managers? That's something a yoyo club does and safeguards the future, whereas we're 180 million in debt.And he has come out and said publically over and over that he needs more players - Just fed up with it.
They backed him in getting Zarate and getting the best out of him, yet he hasn't played him.... How does that make the owners feel?
Why should they fork out again when he doesn't play the players they fork out for?... Mutch was another one. Matty Phillips the same... They let HR have Rio, yet his not played.
The only players HR has played week in week out, who the board backed him signing, have been Vargas, Isla, Fer and Austin... And he plays 3 of those players out of position every week... He doesn't deserve anymore.
If they stick with HR until the end of the season though then the owners should take part of the blame.
It sounds to me as if, he wants Redknapp out but is refusing to spend a penny. TF knows that if he brings in a new manager, he'll have to cough up, so he's waiting until the window slams shut and then Redknapp will get sacked after Southampton or Sunderland games.Comment
-
I think TF and the board have backed HR this season... Who knows, we'll see if HR actually does stay until the end!We've effectively spent 15 million a season over the four years the board has been here, despite spending three of them in the most lucrative league in the world. You think that's backing our managers? That's something a yoyo club does and safeguards the future, whereas we're 180 million in debt.
It sounds to me as if, he wants Redknapp out but is refusing to spend a penny. TF knows that if he brings in a new manager, he'll have to cough up, so he's waiting until the window slams shut and then Redknapp will get sacked after Southampton or Sunderland games.Comment
-
If he sacks Redknapp he will have to get the chequebook out to pay him off, so I think he`ll be staying and will have to work with what he`s got.We've effectively spent 15 million a season over the four years the board has been here, despite spending three of them in the most lucrative league in the world. You think that's backing our managers? That's something a yoyo club does and safeguards the future, whereas we're 180 million in debt.
It sounds to me as if, he wants Redknapp out but is refusing to spend a penny. TF knows that if he brings in a new manager, he'll have to cough up, so he's waiting until the window slams shut and then Redknapp will get sacked after Southampton or Sunderland games.Comment
-
Im a little annoyed. He backs Redknapp, who the majority of us want out. Then he wont give Redknapp the player he needs in the Jan window (I think we can all agree we need a winger). I expected Sako from Wolves from the Mutch money. Seemed like an appropriate buy. He would feature for us in the Championship next year if we went down. Now im confused why we sold Mutch.Comment
Comment