Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Why didn't Isla play?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hubble
    Postmodernist
    • Jan 2013
    • 5616

    #1

    Why didn't Isla play?

    Does anyone know? It seemed really strange to me to play Onouha at RB instead of him, and lose that vital link between Isla and Vargas. I saw Isla was on the bench, so surely he was fit enough to play?
  • march56
    Silver Seat
    • Jan 2011
    • 1275

    #2
    really dont understand that decision hubble

    Comment

    • Jeems
      Silver Seat
      • Jan 2012
      • 2857

      #3
      Tactically I think it an ok idea. HR had set out to defend and Ned is more defensive then Isla. Would have left too many gaps had Isla been playing. Their winger Montero destroyed Callum Chambers last week so it was a good move imo, despite the result and performance. But the way HR wanted us to play, Ned was the better option.

      Comment

      • Hubble
        Postmodernist
        • Jan 2013
        • 5616

        #4
        Okay, I get the reasoning, but I think breaking the link between Isla and Vargas was not outweighed by Nedum's better defensive instincts. I think Harry got that wrong, IMO of course.

        Comment

        • Rangers77
          Platinum Seat
          • Aug 2012
          • 11808

          #5
          A totally wrong decision. Ned plays RB at Newcastle,we lose. Isla at home to Leicester, we win. Ned yesterday.... Harry obviously hasn't got the memo telling him Ned can't play RB. How come idiots like us know that?

          Comment

          • MYU
            Administrator
            • Mar 2009
            • 43466

            #6
            In that case we need another RB to come in for games like this, it would be nice if we can find someone who can play at both RB/CB positions in case of injuries.

            Comment

            • stanistheman
              Platinum Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 11151

              #7
              Originally posted by Jeems
              Tactically I think it an ok idea. HR had set out to defend and Ned is more defensive then Isla. Would have left too many gaps had Isla been playing. Their winger Montero destroyed Callum Chambers last week so it was a good move imo, despite the result and performance. But the way HR wanted us to play, Ned was the better option.
              Good move to sit back and defend for 90 mins trying to nick a draw?

              Sorry, but that failed to work in the previous 6 away games, so why would it work at Swansea?

              It reminds me of that Blackadder Goes Forth battle plan scene. the one where the plan was to go over the top....again. "it failed 17 time times before" to which the response was "exactly. They wont be expecting us to try that again" or something along those lines.
              Last edited by stanistheman; 03-12-2014, 01:04 PM.

              Comment

              • UpperP
                Silver Seat
                • Jul 2010
                • 1055

                #8
                Ned is not good enough to play RB in prem.

                Comment

                • MYU
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 43466

                  #9
                  Originally posted by stanistheman
                  Good move to sit back and defend for 90 mins trying to nick a draw?

                  Sorry, but that failed to work in the previous 6 away games, so why would it work at Swansea?
                  If we're going to lose anyway, why not try to play to win instead of play to draw?

                  Comment

                  • stanistheman
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 11151

                    #10
                    Originally posted by MYU
                    If we're going to lose anyway, why not try to play to win instead of play to draw?
                    hopefully you don't think I wasn't advocating playing for a draw. I was questioning why Jeems thought that was a good move to play the more defensive Onuoha out of position ahead of Isla.

                    Comment

                    • CroydonCaptainJack
                      Gold Seat
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 6141

                      #11
                      Originally posted by stanistheman
                      Good move to sit back and defend for 90 mins trying to nick a draw?

                      Sorry, but that failed to work in the previous 6 away games, so why would it work at Swansea?

                      It reminds me of that Blackadder Goes Forth battle plan scene. the one where the plan was to go over the top....again. "it failed 17 time times before" to which the response was "exactly. They wont be expecting us to try that again" or something along those lines.
                      A brilliant comedy Black Adder (apart from the first series)

                      Comment

                      • stanistheman
                        Platinum Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 11151

                        #12
                        Originally posted by CroydonCaptainJack
                        A brilliant comedy Black Adder (apart from the first series)
                        The 1st series had it's moments though.

                        Comment

                        • Jeems
                          Silver Seat
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 2857

                          #13
                          Originally posted by stanistheman
                          Good move to sit back and defend for 90 mins trying to nick a draw?

                          Sorry, but that failed to work in the previous 6 away games, so why would it work at Swansea?

                          It reminds me of that Blackadder Goes Forth battle plan scene. the one where the plan was to go over the top....again. "it failed 17 time times before" to which the response was "exactly. They wont be expecting us to try that again" or something along those lines.
                          Agree completely, but HR obviously wanted a defensive set up so for this reason alone, Ned was the better option. I didnt like the way we set up at all btw.

                          Comment

                          • Hove Ranger
                            Silver Seat
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 4441

                            #14
                            Originally posted by MYU
                            In that case we need another RB to come in for games like this, it would be nice if we can find someone who can play at both RB/CB positions in case of injuries.
                            Danny Simpson?....... Oh no, we sold him to be in Leicester's reserves with only Ned as backup

                            Comment

                            • Kevin Mcleod
                              Referee
                              • Aug 2013
                              • 17322

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Hove Ranger
                              Danny Simpson?....... Oh no, we sold him to be in Leicester's reserves with only Ned as backup
                              He wanted to go and was toilet anyway.

                              Comment

                              Working...