Proud of the team

[QPRDave]

I fear some people will be happy if we score a couple (even if we concede 10).
Defending is just as important and right now, we're an embarrassment

Our defending was really good for most of the game.... We got beat by 2 og's and a good Coutinho goal.

[nasser95]

Our defending was really good for most of the game.... We got beat by 2 og's and a good Coutinho goal.

And frankly, he shouldn't have been on the pitch with all his cynical fouls

[Marshy]

Our defending was really good for most of the game.... We got beat by 2 og's and a good Coutinho goal.

Even the Coutinho goal wasn't going in but took a deflection

[QPRDave]

Even the Coutinho goal wasn't going in but took a deflection

yeah saw that in the replay....

[Martinmalta]

Excellent game for most players, except for the two own goals. Yun, Isla and Zamora were very good, however cannot understand Ned substitution. Phillips did nearly nothing when he came on, so we lost the energy and creativity of Isla on the right. On the defensive side, Ned was playing really well and I could sense that both Dunne or Caulker will be exposed as they are very slow. Traore, as usual stood still while Liverpool took their quick free kick. Some players never learn will they! McCarthy is a regular starter for me, as should be Vargas. The two Chileans were class today.

[CroydonCaptainJack]

I think "great" is going over the top.

Liverpool were really poor, and they played well. Definitely not rubbish as some are saying, and definitely not great either.

We didn't allow them to play. Big difference.

[Rangers77]

Proud? F ack me. Am I the only one spitting blood at that woeful, inept and unprofessional failure to twice defend a hard won point? To fail to press home a first half advantage by scoring at least once? To be furious with that dumb a ss substitution of the wretched Traore for the supposed beast made of porcelain? That left us short in central midfield by taking both Sandro and Fer out of the game for no advantage on the left wing. None. Both winners were carved through our midfield. Kelvin should have taken a red for their second. We should have stuck with the draw with that free kick. Proud? I'm furious. B loody typical f acking Rangers. B ull s hit. Am fuming.

[Marshy]

Excellent game for most players, except for the two own goals. Yun, Isla and Zamora were very good, however cannot understand Ned substitution.

Hamstring

[QPRDave]

Proud? F ack me. Am I the only one spitting blood at that woeful, inept and unprofessional failure to twice defend a hard won point? To fail to press home a first half advantage by scoring at least once? To be furious with that dumb a ss substitution of the wretched Traore for the supposed beast made of porcelain? That left us short in central midfield by taking both Sandro and Fer out of the game for no advantage on the left wing. None. Both winners were carved through our midfield. Kelvin should have taken a red for their second. We should have stuck with the draw with that free kick. Proud? I'm furious. B loody typical f acking Rangers. B ull s hit. Am fuming.

Think back to West Ham or the others. Those players played for the shirt today. In previous matches there was no energy just lethargy.
Traore came on for Sandro cause he was injured. Who would you have put in there?

[stainrodisalegend]

Sandro and onouha were both injured.

[Rangers77]

Think back to West Ham or the others. Those players played for the shirt today. In previous matches there was no energy just lethargy.
Traore came on for Sandro cause he was injured. Who would you have put in there?

Wanna a choice between s hit or unprofessional. I want to put f acking points on the board. Before Sandro went off we had three in central midfield. When he went off we had two. And that's where their two winners came from. We had no need of playing two 'wingers'. And both of them are utter pants. Kransjar should have come on. He could have played next to Henry. Or Fer could with Kransjar playing in front. Stupid substitution. I assume Ned was injured but wouldnt be surprised of that was a stupid substitution too. That was a spineless way to lose a game. No nouce. Wish we'd lost 0-1.

[Macca]

Agree Krancjar should have come on Phillips was a waste another 2 hamstring injuries again.

[QPRDave]

Ned has a hamstring injury. Bottom line 77, is we should've been playing for a draw and either go for goal full blooded from that fk or go to the corner flag.
Did you notice they had to pull Caulker back

[MYU]

Agree Krancjar should have come on Phillips was a waste another 2 hamstring injuries again.

Krancjar has a broken toe, why risk him?

[Rangers77]

Krancjar has a broken toe, why risk him?

Er. To keep our shape in midfield? To have come away with a point?