If Charlie Austin get injured

[1QPRDK]

You what mate? Charlie Austin has played in every game for us.

Your deluded fella and you clearly do not see it but you will eventually.. I aint letting facts get in the way of anything, if anyone is its fans like you.
Worst goal difference in the league, cant defend. And you cant use injuries as an excuse for the defensive coaching cos we have a fully fit defence.. No style going forward and short of goals and firepower up front.
This teams going no where under Redknapp and it never has been. Charlie, Joey and Onouha bailed him out of it last season.
The 1st thing you do when you come up is organise the team and make it hard for teams to beat you. Something the coaching team haven't done.

Their the facts and the sooner you see it the better.

If you have such good memory then there is no need to check the Tottenham match stats.

[West London is Rss]

If you have such good memory then there is no need to check the Tottenham match stats.

Oh yeah.. How did that game end up again?

[1QPRDK]

That is not the point. You just have to admit defeat it is not even an argument

[West London is Rss]

That is not the point. You just have to admit defeat it is not even an argument

Admit defeat?.. I've just backed up my point with a full paragraph of facts and you've just point blank ignored it? That's the problem with fans like you who still back Redcrapp. You get the facts and stats thrown at you and still go on about backing him. Your not even making sense with your point, all your saying Is that Charlie didn't play in one of the games we lost 4-0 in?

I'll tell ya what the point is shall I.. we lost 4-0 to Spurs.. who goes and beats them two weeks later on the same grass.. West Brom.
We lost 4-0 to United.. who goes and puts 5 past them the week after.. Leicester
Charlie Austin or not.. the team has not set up and cant defend. But its fine, you keep banging on about him playing 5 of those games instead of six.. top argument lad.

[hh9]

West London is Rss
Please answer 2 questions with a yes or no
1. Has QPR won a match with Austin in the team this season?
2. Did Austin play against Tottenham August 14th 2014?

[Bluehoop]

West London is Rss
Please answer 2 questions with a yes or no
1. Has QPR won a match with Austin in the team this season?
2. Did Austin play against Tottenham August 14th 2014?

Don't worry, he will give you the facts, state that they are indeed the facts and then, even when it's shown that they are indeed not the facts, he will own the argument by banging out some new facts

[West London is Rss]

Don't worry, he will give you the facts, state that they are indeed the facts and then, even when it's shown that they are indeed not the facts, he will own the argument by banging out some new facts

Im sorry Blue which part isn't fact on my opinion of how Harry has set the team up and performed this season? Im interested to know which parts...

[West London is Rss]

West London is Rss
Please answer 2 questions with a yes or no
1. Has QPR won a match with Austin in the team this season?
2. Did Austin play against Tottenham August 14th 2014?

1. Yes we have and yes he did. Admittedly I was wrong.. Is that your point? Wanting me to say I was wrong?.. Does knowing Charlie didn't play in that Spurs game make everything else OK for you? Struggling to see your point away from just wanting me to admit I was wrong?

[qprvoyager10]

What if Austin doesn't get injured and scores a lot of goals that keep us in the Prem???
What if our defence can always keep clean sheets?
What if in January we buy a load of strikers and they are scoring for fun??
What if this is a dumb thread?

[Nick]

What if Austin doesn't get injured and scores a lot of goals that keep us in the Prem???
What if our defence can always keep clean sheets?
What if in January we buy a load of strikers and they are scoring for fun??
What if this is a dumb thread?

Tut tut tut you know Voyager that's not how it works on here!!

[1QPRDK]

1. Yes we have and yes he did. Admittedly I was wrong.. Is that your point? Wanting me to say I was wrong?.. Does knowing Charlie didn't play in that Spurs game make everything else OK for you? Struggling to see your point away from just wanting me to admit I was wrong?

Thank you sir. That was the only point I was making. He did not play the spurs game, and so you were wrong on that point. The rest is not facts. It is just your opinion based on your perception of the games, whether you attended in person, watched a stream or read a match report(without paying too much attention to detail :-) ). Either way it does not help your arguments to be factually wrong in the premises.

[Bluehoop]

1. Yes we have and yes he did. Admittedly I was wrong.. Is that your point? Wanting me to say I was wrong?.. Does knowing Charlie didn't play in that Spurs game make everything else OK for you? Struggling to see your point away from just wanting me to admit I was wrong?

You are the wum, sorry one, that is getting all fact this and fact that, but then you type something as fact when it is in fact not fact. Your problem is spouting your sole, turgid and repetitive point over and over again, in every bloody thread is becoming tedious. It's like the kid that thinks if he shouts loud enough and for long enough he will get his own way. So people are getting bored of it and when you make a schoolboy error, like stating facts that aren't actually facts, then people will gladly point out to you what a silly schoolboy error you made.

[West London is Rss]

Thank you sir. That was the only point I was making. He did not play the spurs game, and so you were wrong on that point. The rest is not facts. It is just your opinion based on your perception of the games, whether you attended in person, watched a stream or read a match report(without paying too much attention to detail :-) ). Either way it does not help your arguments to be factually wrong in the premises.

Mate it is fact? - We have the worst defence in the league and have no playing style. FACT.. That's the only facts im trying to state and its true!!

[Bluehoop]

What if Austin doesn't get injured and scores a lot of goals that keep us in the Prem???
What if our defence can always keep clean sheets?
What if in January we buy a load of strikers and they are scoring for fun??
What if this is a dumb thread?

But there is absolutely no way any of these things can possibly happen. It's written in the stars after 6 games of the season that we will not win another game, score another goal, get our injured players fit, sort out a system and team that has continuity and will be relegated by the end of October. Those my friend are apparently facts so you must repeat them ad infinitum, until you believe them to be facts and, if you don't, you will be put up against a wall, and be shot, metaphorically speaking of course.

[West London is Rss]

You are the wum, sorry one, that is getting all fact this and fact that, but then you type something as fact when it is in fact not fact. Your problem is spouting your sole, turgid and repetitive point over and over again, in every bloody thread is becoming tedious. It's like the kid that thinks if he shouts loud enough and for long enough he will get his own way. So people are getting bored of it and when you make a schoolboy error, like stating facts that aren't actually facts, then people will gladly point out to you what a silly schoolboy error you made.

Yeah, I was wrong and I held my hands up.. a lot more then 80% of people do on here.. Don't be telling me what my problem is lad. It aint a problem its your opinion on me.
Block me then, ignore me.. don't pipe up cos your getting annoyed with it.. im allowed to 'spout' my opinion where I want.

Stop spitting your dummy out and Answer my point.. what part of my opinion aint facts? - (other than the Austin thing which ive held my hands to) Worst goal difference and no playing style