Remy staying?

[twranger]

There's a key point in the article that has been made... It highlights that TF is making it clear that Remy won't go cheap.... maybe that's what all this is about. TF knows he'll be sold and is just trying to up his value.

exactly Nick, no where does it say he is staying....2+2=5 again.

[jmelanie]

This suggests no release clause. I think other clubs were only interested if they could get him cheap.

[qprted]

i would say

i have said all along that remy would stay we will pay him 140 000 a week for one season only,he will have release cause of 12 million this will let us recoup our money,anf it gives us twelve months to find replacement

[jmelanie]

i have said all along that remy would stay we will pay him 140 000 a week for one season only,he will have release cause of 12 million this will let us recoup our money,anf it gives us twelve months to find replacement

Why would we change the conditions on a contract which is set to run for another 3 years. Also this would not be fair on our other players, especially those who stuck with the team in the Championship.

[scuberry]

This suggests no release clause. I think other clubs were only interested if they could get him cheap.

Please do start people off again on this release clause,its been done to death and also voyager this is old news as this was also done to death yesterday,please check threads before duplicating :o(

[Nick]

exactly Nick, no where does it say he is staying....2+2=5 again.

Yep unfortunately that's what I made of it, oh well the dream was nice while it lasted.

[robloft]

Please do start people off again on this release clause,its been done to death and also voyager this is old news as this was also done to death yesterday,please check threads before duplicating :o(

Why should we read every f***ing post before posting our own comment, if it's been done to death tough sh*t!

[maidstone_hoop]

He should be playing for us, he should have been playing for us last season. But, hey.....The guy is just too big for little old QPR, or so he thinks.

or so he thinks? truth is he probably is too big for us. The lad could easily play for a top 6 and arguably top four team. We certainly aint that the last time I checked.

[Busheyboy]

as I said on another Remy thread, my feeling is the release clause was ONLY last year, if we went down.

Don't think it was forever (obviously I may be wrong)

Correct price is £16m- £20 m IMO

[dsqpr]

Why would we change the conditions on a contract which is set to run for another 3 years. Also this would not be fair on our other players, especially those who stuck with the team in the Championship.

You seem to be taking one of ted's posts seriously JM!

[jmelanie]

You seem to be taking one of ted's posts seriously JM!

Not really, though on the rare occasion he talks some sense.

[BUSHRANGER1982]

or so he thinks? truth is he probably is too big for us. The lad could easily play for a top 6 and arguably top four team. We certainly aint that the last time I checked.

Remy is not too big a player for QPR.
Who's he ever played for? And it wasn't that long ago, that we were a big enough club for him to grace us with his presence. We did sign him, didn't we?

[stainrodisalegend]

Seems pretty clear from the press this morning that he's very close to signing for Arsenal.

[Kevin Mcleod]

And Liverpool.

[Shepherds Mush]

I don't think Arsenal will get Remy. If they get Sanchez, they will have him and a 20 goal PL striker (Giroud). They wont bench a £32m player and Giroud is more than adequate alongside or as a sub.

Arsenal wont pay Remy his reported £75k a week to be a bit part.