Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Players Contracts

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QPR Richard
    Gold Seat
    • Sep 2011
    • 6489

    #1

    Players Contracts

    Players earn big money. They also get win bonuses and appearance money. Don't have a problem with that.

    However, players should also get loss deductions as well as non-appearance deductions. It seemed today that most didn't turn up!
    Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
  • MYU
    Administrator
    • Mar 2009
    • 43466

    #2
    It's our fault for over paying. Hope that from now on we pay normal wages and give better than normal bonuses to attract new players.

    Comment

    • James1979
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 4857

      #3
      whenever we lose it's always lack of effort...bit like last season. Last season, effort was not the problem, they were just a group of strangers playing together. This year...pretty much the same but even less quality.

      Comment

      • twranger
        On the posh naughty step
        • Mar 2009
        • 10472

        #4
        Originally posted by QPR Richard
        Players earn big money. They also get win bonuses and appearance money. Don't have a problem with that.

        However, players should also get loss deductions as well as non-appearance deductions. It seemed today that most didn't turn up!
        That's up there with some fans wanting a refund on their ticket when things don't go as they wanted.....actually, come to think of it, surprised no one has chirped up with that one yet, after today!

        Comment

        • W12_Ranger
          Platinum Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 11447

          #5
          Originally posted by QPR Richard
          Players earn big money. They also get win bonuses and appearance money. Don't have a problem with that.

          However, players should also get loss deductions as well as non-appearance deductions. It seemed today that most didn't turn up!
          So you would be happy to have your wages deducted then Dicky if you were a footballer?

          We should apply your logic to the public sector it would save the taxpayer billions

          Comment

          • TBLOCKRANGER
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2011
            • 2909

            #6
            Originally posted by twranger
            That's up there with some fans wanting a refund on their ticket when things don't go as they wanted.....actually, come to think of it, surprised no one has chirped up with that one yet, after today!
            Certainly up their with refunds TW.

            Could you imagine the players we would be enticing? Make the current signings look like buys of the season. Posters moan about losing out on players that instead went to Hull, Norwich etc imagine what we would end up with if a clause suggested by the OP was incorporated into all QPR contracts.

            Comment

            • QPR Richard
              Gold Seat
              • Sep 2011
              • 6489

              #7
              Originally posted by W12_Ranger
              So you would be happy to have your wages deducted then Dicky if you were a footballer?

              We should apply your logic to the public sector it would save the taxpayer billions
              Er, my post was tongue in cheek but then Victor , you're totally humourless and you wouldn't get the irony.....
              Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

              Comment

              • W12_Ranger
                Platinum Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 11447

                #8
                Originally posted by TBLOCKRANGER
                Certainly up their with refunds TW.

                Could you imagine the players we would be enticing? Make the current signings look like buys of the season. Posters moan about losing out on players that instead went to Hull, Norwich etc imagine what we would end up with if a clause suggested by the OP was incorporated into all QPR contracts.
                We'd never fill the 40k seat stadium he thinks we'd fill that's for sure

                Comment

                • QPR Richard
                  Gold Seat
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 6489

                  #9
                  Originally posted by W12_Ranger
                  We'd never fill the 40k seat stadium he thinks we'd fill that's for sure
                  Funnily enough, I'm not the only one who supports a move to a 40k stadium. Many fans do and so does the board, the people who'll be paying for it.

                  But I digress Vicky....
                  Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                  Comment

                  • twranger
                    On the posh naughty step
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10472

                    #10
                    Originally posted by TBLOCKRANGER
                    Certainly up their with refunds TW.

                    Could you imagine the players we would be enticing? Make the current signings look like buys of the season. Posters moan about losing out on players that instead went to Hull, Norwich etc imagine what we would end up with if a clause suggested by the OP was incorporated into all QPR contracts.
                    That is very true T, doesn't bare thinking about does it.....

                    Comment

                    • QPR Richard
                      Gold Seat
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 6489

                      #11
                      Originally posted by twranger
                      That is very true T, doesn't bare thinking about does it.....
                      Mr Spellchecker, you like to pull people up about their grammar. It should be bear
                      Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                      Comment

                      • twranger
                        On the posh naughty step
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 10472

                        #12
                        Originally posted by QPR Richard
                        Mr Spellchecker, you like to pull people up about their grammar. It should be bear
                        But this is a spelling error, not grammar.....anyway
                        thanks, I stand corrected.....wasn't too sure, so plumped for the wrong one obviously!

                        Comment

                        Working...