Can't understand why you'd play a journeyman like O'Neil over a class act like AJ. We were good throughout; we were very good with AJ. His playing meant Nico could step up a gear. First name on the team sheet after Clint and Joey for me.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If he's fit AJ starts. Every game, OK, Harry!!
Collapse
X
-
I agree with you but the big if with him is his fitness, he looked very good when he came into the match today and may open things up for Austin!Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostCan't understand why you'd play a journeyman like O'Neil over a class act like AJ. We were good throughout; we were very good with AJ. His playing meant Nico could step up a gear. First name on the team sheet after Clint and Joey for me.@gatorTFC
Comment
-
Have to agree, although it won't happen as Harry is too focused on systems and determined for us to not play 4-4-2.Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostCan't understand why you'd play a journeyman like O'Neil over a class act like AJ. We were good throughout; we were very good with AJ. His playing meant Nico could step up a gear. First name on the team sheet after Clint and Joey for me.
Don't get me wrong we look ok, but with Johnson on the pitch we seem to have that extra bit of pace and urgency needed to put teams under pressure.
Comment
-
Hoilett should stay on the bench, period! I think he'll be out (again) for some time now which could be a blessing in disguise as Harry will be forced to use others in that position! I see why Harry starts him but he to me just seems to do lots of nothing, always looks potentially threatning, has a crack or two on goal like today but rarely scores! AJ straight in for Hoilett suits me fine!Originally posted by MarkinLA View PostAgreed, also we looked better with Hoilet not injecting himself into play. He always goes into the middle, clogs it up and then does nothing. I don't care for him at all. He should just stay on the wing, period.@gatorTFC
Comment
-
If he's fit AJ starts. Every game, OK, Harry!!
Don't reckon Harry reads stuff here mate!Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostCan't understand why you'd play a journeyman like O'Neil over a class act like AJ. We were good throughout; we were very good with AJ. His playing meant Nico could step up a gear. First name on the team sheet after Clint and Joey for me.
If he did though, pretty sure he'd sit up and take note of your excellent suggestion!!
Comment
-
So the 3rd name then? :-)Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostCan't understand why you'd play a journeyman like O'Neil over a class act like AJ. We were good throughout; we were very good with AJ. His playing meant Nico could step up a gear. First name on the team sheet after Clint and Joey for me.
Comment
-
O'Neil's been one of our best players this season for me. Very good on the ball, rarely gives it away and uses it very intelligently.
Johnson comes on and has 15 good minutes and all of a sudden we should change our entire system to accommodate him? No chance.
Good player when fit, but he is rarely fit and we haven't got the players for 4-4-2. Also to be honest we were more like 4-3-3 in the first half with Philips and Hoilett attacking.
It was a very good point at Reading yesterday and we could have easily won it had we taken our chances. No need for Johnson to start IMO.
Comment
-
Exactly.....everyone knows AJ is a fine player but everyone also knows that he will be broken again within a few games..Originally posted by DouDou_87 View PostO'Neil's been one of our best players this season for me. Very good on the ball, rarely gives it away and uses it very intelligently.
Johnson comes on and has 15 good minutes and all of a sudden we should change our entire system to accommodate him? No chance.
Good player when fit, but he is rarely fit and we haven't got the players for 4-4-2. Also to be honest we were more like 4-3-3 in the first half with Philips and Hoilett attacking.
It was a very good point at Reading yesterday and we could have easily won it had we taken our chances. No need for Johnson to start IMO.
Comment
-
Cant agree whatsoever here. We are better than near on every team we play, we just dont put the domination into goals. We would of lost and no goals again if it wasnt for bartons superb dead ball. People are starting to think our full name is Queens Park Rangers Nil. We need to score more, cos that is the only way we are falling short, everywhere else we are near on perfect.Originally posted by DouDou_87 View PostO'Neil's been one of our best players this season for me. Very good on the ball, rarely gives it away and uses it very intelligently.
Johnson comes on and has 15 good minutes and all of a sudden we should change our entire system to accommodate him? No chance.
Good player when fit, but he is rarely fit and we haven't got the players for 4-4-2. Also to be honest we were more like 4-3-3 in the first half with Philips and Hoilett attacking.
It was a very good point at Reading yesterday and we could have easily won it had we taken our chances. No need for Johnson to start IMO.
Comment
lofl.........like saying QPR are currently first............ after Burnley and Leicester!!!!!!!
Comment