New stadium ownership

[vblockranger]

So is everyone a bellend who doesn't agree with you ?

He's French Vesps so have to cut him some slack ...

[vespa]

He's French Vesps so have to cut him some slack ...

' the lads a Frenchman , anything could happen ! ' Tango advert .

[Johnnykc]

I take it I'm one of the bellends then Johny ?

If so read through all of my posts on the matter, I fully accept a move is in the offing BUT as a great many people also agree with, my view on the matter is ;

I DON'T THINK A 40k STADIUM WOULD ENHANCE THE AVERAGE FANS MATCHDAY EXPERIENCE ...........

BUT

It would enhance TF's turnover on other events !

No NW......I don't think you are.

I accept that people have reservations about what MAY happen to our club in the future, I'm not without a few myself.......the 'bellend' comment was directed at posts that purposefully go to the absolute extremes of what may happen making it sound like we're definitely being royally f***ed.....

So is everyone a bellend who doesn't agree with you ?

Please see above!

[Johnnykc]

s'il vous plaît voir ci-dessus....

[vblockranger]

No NW......I don't think you are.

I accept that people have reservations about what MAY happen to our club in the future, I'm not without a few myself.......the 'bellend' comment was directed at posts that purposefully go to the absolute extremes of what may happen making it sound like we're definitely being royally f***ed.....

Ahh i see you mean the extreme comments such as this ...

" Failure to move with the times will condemn our club to oblivion."

and

"Do you not remember the buckets?"

So its move or die according to some...

[Johnnykc]

Ahh i see you mean the extreme comments such as this ...

" Failure to move with the times will condemn our club to oblivion."

and

"Do you not remember the buckets?"

So its move or die according to some...

Touche!.......bellends come in all shapes and sizes!

[QPRDave]

I've never known so many chaps wringing their hands over money yet will go football and spend £300 without thinking about it!!.....I really don't think if all the Mittals or Tony wanted was the stadium they'd shell out dosh ......good amount of dosh too on the players we have.

[NW_Hoopz]

Ahh i see you mean the extreme comments such as this ...

" Failure to move with the times will condemn our club to oblivion."

and

"Do you not remember the buckets?"

So its move or die according to some...

Touche!.......bellends come in all shapes and sizes!

You always get in before me VBLOCK !

[QPR Richard]

Ahhh so this is the thread for happy clappy kids with #### cheeks spread wide so Uncle Tony can give them a good seeing too while wearing their London Rangers shirt? Also see there are some quite sensible posters in here so its not all for the kids. Oi Johnny how many FIFA stars you reckon QPR will get next season in the prem? :-)

Who's this London Rangers mob you keep banging on about? Thought this was about Queens Park Rangers....

[PeterG]

"I don't care what they do as long as our club is secure, I'm sure both Tony & Amit will not damage the long term future of this club."

Forgive me for saying this MYU but that is a naive thing to say. have you forgotten Chris Wright, people said the same about him but he did us up like a kipper, we were lucky to get out of that alive and how we got out of it (abc loan) almost killed us anyway

I may well be that TF and co have the best interests of the football club at heart but its frankly unlikely to be the primary driver in such a huge investment as a new stadium complex at Old Oak Common.

Rather a succesful football club with growing attendances may be the leverage needed to get a foot in at Old Oak with the council for the multi activity sports and leisure complex being planned

Thats not to paint TF as a pirate but there is probably more at stake for the owners here than just QPR, so as one poster suggested earlier in the thread its imperative that some form of protection is sought in terms of the rights of the "Football club" in relation to any stadium move. Things change in business and what seems like a priority at one point can become insignificant a year or 2 down the line. If we do move we as supporters need to make sure that QPR is protected from becoming insignificant to the owners whether that is TF and co or new owners of the complex in the future should TF and co decide to move on

[vblockranger]

"I don't care what they do as long as our club is secure, I'm sure both Tony & Amit will not damage the long term future of this club."

Forgive me for saying this MYU but that is a naive thing to say. have you forgotten Chris Wright, people said the same about him but he did us up like a kipper, we were lucky to get out of that alive and how we got out of it (abc loan) almost killed us anyway

I may well be that TF and co have the best interests of the football club at heart but its frankly unlikely to be the primary driver in such a huge investment as a new stadium complex at Old Oak Common.

Rather a succesful football club with growing attendances may be the leverage needed to get a foot in at Old Oak with the council for the multi activity sports and leisure complex being planned

Thats not to paint TF as a pirate but there is probably more at stake for the owners here than just QPR, so as one poster suggested earlier in the thread its imperative that some form of protection is sought in terms of the rights of the "Football club" in relation to any stadium move. Things change in business and what seems like a priority at one point can become insignificant a year or 2 down the line. If we do move we as supporters need to make sure that QPR is protected from becoming insignificant to the owners whether that is TF and co or new owners of the complex in the future should TF and co decide to move on

Good post mate

[MrSwakeley]

"I don't care what they do as long as our club is secure, I'm sure both Tony & Amit will not damage the long term future of this club."

Forgive me for saying this MYU but that is a naive thing to say. have you forgotten Chris Wright, people said the same about him but he did us up like a kipper, we were lucky to get out of that alive and how we got out of it (abc loan) almost killed us anyway

I may well be that TF and co have the best interests of the football club at heart but its frankly unlikely to be the primary driver in such a huge investment as a new stadium complex at Old Oak Common.

Rather a succesful football club with growing attendances may be the leverage needed to get a foot in at Old Oak with the council for the multi activity sports and leisure complex being planned

Thats not to paint TF as a pirate but there is probably more at stake for the owners here than just QPR, so as one poster suggested earlier in the thread its imperative that some form of protection is sought in terms of the rights of the "Football club" in relation to any stadium move. Things change in business and what seems like a priority at one point can become insignificant a year or 2 down the line. If we do move we as supporters need to make sure that QPR is protected from becoming insignificant to the owners whether that is TF and co or new owners of the complex in the future should TF and co decide to move on

Absolutely spot on.

[vespa]

Good post Peter