ffs Holt

[qpr]

is he f?*ck

Sorry I didn't mean honest

[Mellowhoop]

Sorry I didn't mean honest

He's not honest is he?

[Fordy]

Would have him over Crouch. Absolute battering ram and top championship striker

[Mellowhoop]

I would have him over crouch....

[qpr]

My lord is there some utter ******** spoken in this forum

Calm down, it's changed

[Yousef]

Wished we had. At least he fight for the ball.

[twranger]

We'd all love Holt at the Rangers......doing what Holt does best.....no one would complain then!!!! Hate double standards!:rage:

[DeepcutHoop]

We'd all love Holt at the Rangers......doing what Holt does best.....no one would complain then!!!! Hate double standards!:rage:

I wouldn't want him here.

There's a difference between backing a player once he's at Rangers, and actively wanting him to join.

He's a cheat, and loves to referee games himself, and we've pretty much all cursed him for doing that.

Surely the double standard is with those that are happy for our players to cheat, while decrying the opposition for doing it.

[Ginger Ninja]

We'd all love Holt at the Rangers......doing what Holt does best.....no one would complain then!!!! Hate double standards!:rage:

not me! can't stand the fat c#@*.

[West Acton]

Lots of us could not stand Warnock before he arrived but hes a hero now he got the same reaction before his arrival

[twranger]

[QUOTE=DeepcutHoop;1099781]I wouldn't want him here.

There's a difference between backing a player once he's at Rangers, and actively wanting him to join.

He's a cheat, and loves to referee games himself, and we've pretty much all cursed him for doing that.

Surely the double standard is with those that are happy for our players to cheat, while decrying the opposition for doing it.[/QUOTE]
exactly....that's exactly my point...IF he was to come to LR, all of a sudden the way Holt plays the game would become acceptable because he plays for Rangers....those knocking him before would suddenly welcome his antics....that's double standards. Hypothetical anyway so move on.

[Ginger Ninja]

[QUOTE=twranger;1099785]

I wouldn't want him here.

There's a difference between backing a player once he's at Rangers, and actively wanting him to join.

He's a cheat, and loves to referee games himself, and we've pretty much all cursed him for doing that.

Surely the double standard is with those that are happy for our players to cheat, while decrying the opposition for doing it.[/QUOTE]
exactly....that's exactly my point...IF he was to come to LR, all of a sudden the way Holt plays the game would become acceptable because he plays for Rangers....those knocking him before would suddenly welcome his antics....that's double standards. Hypothetical anyway so move on.

Like i said, not me. If he did sign, then of course i'd have to back him. If he scored for us, of course i'd cheer. But i'd still hate the way he plays and cons refs. The bloke's a complete knob and that opinion wouldnt change if he signed for us.

[DeepcutHoop]

exactly....that's exactly my point...IF he was to come to LR, all of a sudden the way Holt plays the game would become acceptable because he plays for Rangers....those knocking him before would suddenly welcome his antics....that's double standards. Hypothetical anyway so move on.

Ah, gotcha.

[DeepcutHoop]

Like i said, not me. If he did sign, then of course i'd have to back him. If he scored for us, of course i'd cheer. But i'd still hate the way he plays and cons refs. The bloke's a complete knob and that opinion wouldnt change if he signed for us.

Exactly.

[QPRDave]

How do you spell honest? Cheater?

Exactly wolfy!!!