Warren Farm delayed by legal action

[blueboy]

No doubt a load of Brentford fans getting together to cause trouble. Why else would you object to new facilities on your door step which improve the area and which you will be able to use part of

i wonder how many of these locals actually use Warren Farm?All they are concerned about is traffic

[QPR Richard]

MH would not have any input in this decision ,more than likely told there was no rush

I'm sure that when Hughes was the manager and Harlington was tarted up, TF said there was no rush to leave because Hughes was happy with it. He'd got the improvements he wanted.

[West Acton]

I'm sure that when Hughes was the manager and Harlington was tarted up, TF said there was no rush to leave because Hughes was happy with it. He'd got the improvements he wanted.

He got everything he wanted he was just a t urd manager and could not take advantage of his good fortune.

See he has gone into Stoke and culled a load of players straight away of which one is Pennant I would give him a run out down at ours

[MattyRangers]

Few locals making some noise to try grab emself a little bit of compo me reckons.

[kron-1664]

that piece of land is not exactly a 'place of natural beauty' its a wasteland. Honestly some people will complain just for the sake of it.

[NW_Hoopz]

"Club aware of latest action regarding Warren Farm ...

THE club is aware of action being taken by the Hanwell Community Forum (HCF) against the London Borough of Ealing in relation to Warren Farm.
x?[/url]

I lived in the Costa Del Hanwell in the early 90's for a couple of years, when the Bus station was shutting down some idiots set up a protest group to stop Tescos opening up there ..............

Thanks to them Hanwell ended up with an Aldi & a Poundstretcher and the demise continued , I sold up just in time !

After the NIMBY's have their day in court , Warren farm will probably end up with a Boys Brigade football pitch on it ........

[Yousef]

Wonderful. The good news seem to continue.

[qpr]

What is it with QPR and problems. ****ing hell

[LeeCookFan]

This sounds really bad. This is the same side of London that managed to scrap plans for expanding Heathrow because "it might get a little noisy." If Heathrwo lost to these people determined to stand in the way of progress, what chance do we stand?

[West Acton]

This sounds really bad. This is the same side of London that managed to scrap plans for expanding Heathrow because "it might get a little noisy." If Heathrwo lost to these people determined to stand in the way of progress, what chance do we stand?

No chance. The council were against new runway and were on the side of the protesters this time there in opposite camps the council will win

[Ed the Ball]

Warren farm has the canal running at the back of it which runs all the way to the Thames, and up North the other way. That will not be affected by the training ground and to the right of the ground is a golf course and wooded area which will not be affected. So these protesters IMO have no case at all (I hope!)

[Ric-Roc]

Will probably end up in a 3 year court case.

[TBLOCKRANGER]

It's seems annoying but understandable IMHO.
I don't know the ins and outs of the matter but I surmise the issue is a large plot of "public" land being sold to a private investor. A section of the "public" are now complaining. I presume the action is against the Council rather than QPR as to whether the publics interest was taking into consideration which would centre around what were the public consultations like prior to planning permission being approved.
If the Council can show it fairly and transparently consulted with the public prior to approval then everything should be Ok especially if this is reflected in what the public benefit from the scheme. If it's found that wasn't the case then it may be found the giving of planning permission was wrong and the process including consultation etc will need to start again meaning delays of years as mentioned above.
I haven't a scooby about planning but these things happen and the rush rush approach the club now adopt for everything probably needs to be reassessed.

[CroydonCaptainJack]

It's seems annoying but understandable IMHO.
I don't know the ins and outs of the matter but I surmise the issue is a large plot of "public" land being sold to a private investor. A section of the "public" are now complaining. I presume the action is against the Council rather than QPR as to whether the publics interest was taking into consideration which would centre around what were the public consultations like prior to planning permission being approved.
If the Council can show it fairly and transparently consulted with the public prior to approval then everything should be Ok especially if this is reflected in what the public benefit from the scheme. If it's found that wasn't the case then it may be found the giving of planning permission was wrong and the process including consultation etc will need to start again meaning delays of years as mentioned above.
I haven't a scooby about planning but these things happen and the rush rush approach the club now adopt for everything probably needs to be reassessed.

Without knowing the ins and outs how do you know it was rushed?
I doubt very much it was rushed having some knowledge of planning procedures.
Looks like the curse of QPR goes on!

[jmelanie]

http://www.savewarrenfarm.com/#/community-opinionpoll/4574990529

Look at the right hand side of the page.