Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Watson or Rowlands

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qprjames
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 4353

    #16
    Originally posted by Cait.
    Faurlin and Watson will play together. You watch and see.
    I think Watson/ Rowlands and Legs of wood
    Now, Then, Forever
    [CENTER]QPR-Football League CHAMPIONS

    Comment

    • stan_bowles
      CCG
      • Mar 2009
      • 8391

      #17
      Originally posted by Insp Clouseau
      you think maybe for five in mf? is possible but like formation of sousa?
      Would not be surprised.We are still in the same situation of being over staffed in midfield and understaffed up front.

      Hope Simpson can play the lone striker role.

      Comment

      • Insp Clouseau
        Apprentice
        • Sep 2009
        • 11

        #18
        Originally posted by m_cooper
        both cmf for me
        Originally posted by qprjames
        Welcome to the site by the way;D
        thank you!

        Comment

        • W12_Ranger
          Platinum Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 11447

          #19
          Originally posted by qprjames
          Disagree, think rowlands is still quality
          won't start a game as long as Faurlin and Watson are fit

          Comment

          • Robbo
            Silver Seat
            • May 2009
            • 1377

            #20
            We spent a couple of million on Faurlin, (not sure it was £3.5m) and Watson is a cert.

            So whatever people think, or who'd they prefer... that will be the first choice CM partnership.

            Comment

            • m_cooper
              Silver Seat
              • Jul 2009
              • 1341

              #21
              we will prob play 5 in midfield or 4-1
              routledge rowly watson ephraim
              taarabt
              simpson

              as the squad stands;don't think jm rates buzz and not sure if he will play taarabt and buzz in same team again

              Comment

              • Insp Clouseau
                Apprentice
                • Sep 2009
                • 11

                #22
                Originally posted by m_cooper
                the problem with the loan signings is the pressure for them to play or be recalled by their club,no point in being on loan and not playing;so taarabt,watson,simpson more or less pick themselves
                yes I wish we buy players rather than to make them fit and send them home to owners

                Comment

                • Ads1985
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 577

                  #23
                  3 CMF's.

                  Rowlands Watson Faurlin

                  3 strikers/attackers

                  Routledge Simpson Taraabt

                  4-3-3.
                  15 years in the wilderness will be a distant memory come Sunday 8th May 2011.

                  Comment

                  • stan_bowles
                    CCG
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 8391

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Ads1985
                    3 CMF's.

                    Rowlands Watson Faurlin

                    3 strikers/attackers

                    Routledge Simpson Taraabt

                    4-3-3.
                    Still effectively 4-5-1 though ain't it mate.

                    Comment

                    • dangould
                      Apprentice
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 234

                      #25
                      I dont know Watson yet, but i do know that Rowlands never ever let us down cares for the club my vote goes to Rowlands

                      Comment

                      • m_cooper
                        Silver Seat
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 1341

                        #26
                        i can't see why you would send rowly out on loan and play a loanee who is not going to sign for qpr?send out mahon yes i agree with that

                        Comment

                        • Insp Clouseau
                          Apprentice
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 11

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Ads1985
                          3 CMF's.

                          Rowlands Watson Faurlin

                          3 strikers/attackers

                          Routledge Simpson Taraabt

                          4-3-3.
                          also possible but is same idea i think as 4-5-1 no? routledge/taraabt making back to wingers or joining attack? flexible formation like teams of premiership

                          Comment

                          • W12_Ranger
                            Platinum Seat
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 11447

                            #28
                            We will play 4-4-2 or if you wanna be clever maybe a 4-4-1-1 which is basically a 4-4-2. You know the formation you were all crying about us not playing last season.

                            Faurlin and Watson in the middle and only place you'll see Buzsaky play is LM (if he picked) -not in the middle or the right or as the second striker where he has never actually played for us.

                            Rowlands will spend the best part of the next 2/3 months at least polishing the bench with his a rse

                            Comment

                            • qprjames
                              Silver Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 4353

                              #29
                              Originally posted by dangould
                              I dont know Watson yet, but i do know that Rowlands never ever let us down cares for the club my vote goes to Rowlands
                              agree
                              Now, Then, Forever
                              [CENTER]QPR-Football League CHAMPIONS

                              Comment

                              • qpr_andy
                                Apprentice
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 183

                                #30
                                Both we play

                                Comment

                                Working...