Can't see who would improve what we have and to sack GA would cost. Catch 22, stick or twist.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Leeds Match Thread
Collapse
X
-
Being realistic pretty much every fan knew we would struggle and I don't think GA helps saying we're good enough l, now he can't say we're shite and got no hope I get that but the squads of L1 if not 2 quality with too many players we've got some good pros in Begovic,cook,colback and field but having to start games with kakay Smyth and sa your up against it.Originally posted by QPR Yorkie View PostCan't see who would improve what we have and to sack GA would cost. Catch 22, stick or twist.
I just don't see enough goals in us and to not sign another cf will be our downfall
- Likes 1
Comment
-
So Bamford says he does not touch him(Did not affect the result I know )we were shite.So why does he not tell the ref at the time instead of looking for a foul to get him sent off.im front of the crowd to get in their good books ,Its all good Gareth saying he’s a good lad after the game but he’s a ####ing chest ,who should be suspended.As for us the managers clueless if he thinks we had resilience,We hardly shoot ,we play it sideways and backwards slowly then lose the ball or kick it up field back to the opponent.This style of football is utter #### and by the time we get a result or 2 we will be stuck in the mire down the bottom when it’s too late.
Comment
-
I think he should take a lot of the blame. Its his choice of players and tactics, we may not be able to win with these players but in the formation he sets up we have been caught out far to often. My point is he dosent appear to be learning from the results.Originally posted by Sleeping Giants View Post
I honestly don't think you can blame GA. Kakay has been poor lately and Cannon has been signed ( not fit tho), we clearly need at least one striker, probably more. He has players who are unavailable for various reasons, at the end of the day he doesn't have a lot to work with.
Comment
-
Red card offence:Originally posted by 72bus View PostIf the ref deems it a reckless challenge then it's a foul whether he touches bamford or not.
Sending him off is harsh.
"Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play".
And:
"Denying a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to an opponent whose overall movement is towards the offender's goal by an offence punishable by a free kick"
Comment
-
Still open to the refs interpretation, so he can go either way.Originally posted by SheepRanger View Post
Red card offence:
"Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play".
And:
"Denying a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to an opponent whose overall movement is towards the offender's goal by an offence punishable by a free kick"
Comment

Comment