Wolves 2 QPR 1 **Match Thread**

[Rangers77]

Oh. I didn't realise it was 4 or 5-0 in the first half, my bad.

It could have been. It was a friendly LOL, btw. It's good we didn't get battered.

[Ginger Ninja]

True but better 2nd half set up to have a go but first half set up
not to lose we were dismal again

I agree with you Bill, I was on about the scoreline, with many including myself predicting at least 3-0. And the fact that we showed fight and almost nicked a draw from 2 down in the 2nd half is nothing but a positive.
Frustrating that we don't do that from the start.

[Ginger Ninja]

It could have been. It was a friendly LOL, btw. It's good we didn't get battered.

Sorry mate, I took the LOL the wrong way. I was talking about the scoreline.

[Pinkie]

Oh. I didn't realise it was 4 or 5-0 in the first half, my bad.

We didnt ginge, we`ve just got a load of toy throwers on here, think someone said they had about 2 on target and we had 6 for the whole game, but i might of got that wrong

[Fraggy]

Highlights for those in the U.K.

http://www.skysports.com/football/wolves-vs-qpr/374990

Shows how bad we were first half, but better second.

I'd put this in a new thread, but mods (a mod?) is currently deleting threads for some reason........

What's been deleted?
The only post I deleted, was mine after you deleted yours.

[Greg1882]

Actually, Greg we weren’t. Until they scored their first we were the better side. The rest of the half was theirs, but our second half performance was excellent, and surely you have to give Ollie credit for finding a formula that nearly worked against the Championships equivalent of Man City? By the way, the most promising cameo to date from Eze and a really nice goal from Connor that just might make him believe he’s a striker again.

12 minutes. I watched the game btw. He only found that formula when we were already 2-0 down. The point I’m trying to make is we are stating with a handicap before a ball is kicked. That is what’s killing us. I’m not taking anything away from what was an excellent 2nd half showing

[1973 ranger]

The big issue with Holloway and Bircham combination is that they do not look like they coach us to play a certain way. As soon as we go behind we send for big Smith and revert to direct tactics rather than sticking to a certain style of play.

[Bill]

Again, and please don't count me as an Ollie fan, how is that on him when the players he chooses don't execute, there are not many striker options atm nor has there been all year, it's where we are at, we need to keep winning in our mini league and hope this FFP gets sorted and we can improve the side no matter who the gaffer is next season!

Square pegs round holes play the players you
have in their correct and comfortable positions and thereby
Play to your strengths.

You cant make gold out of pig ****

[Stanley]

How is that on him

For stubbornly refusing to budge from his clearly failed formation - all season long. That is 100% on him and nobody else.

[Rangers77]

What's been deleted?
The only post I deleted, was mine after you deleted yours.

Threads. A serious one was moved. As was a facetious one. It doesn't really matter, I know.........

[Bill]

We didnt ginge, we`ve just got a load of toy throwers on here, think someone said they had about 2 on target and we had 6 for the whole game, but i might of got that wrong

I give up you obviohsly know best not wasting my time with you
Yosser

[Pinkie]

It could have been. It was a friendly LOL, btw. It's good we didn't get battered.

givve over you wonderful person, they had 2 shots on our goal stats wise for the whole game, no wonder youre drivel in new threads are getting deleted lol

[Rangers77]

Sorry mate, I took the LOL the wrong way. I was talking about the scoreline.

No worries. I'm so fuming at that abject display of mismanagement, I'm probably being an a sswipe.

[Pinkie]

The big issue with Holloway and Bircham combination is that they do not look like they coach us to play a certain way. As soon as we go behind we send for big Smith and revert to direct tactics rather than sticking to a certain style of play.

forking hell ffs 73, what are you on about? so if he didnt resort to our plan b what do you want another couple of games before we score lol

[Rangers77]

givve over you tool, they had 2 shots on our goal stats wise for the whole game, no wonder youre drivel in new threads are getting deleted lol

Good to see you're still creaming yourself in public over losing 2-1.