Villa winner

[UB5 Ranger]

:rage::rage: Just seen the winning goal on game of the day and just as i thought at the game it was a handball by Wiemann before he pulled it back for Benteke.
Not too suprised the ref never gave us the decision because he aint no friend of Rrrssssss ****

[dave58]

:rage::rage: Just seen the winning goal on game of the day and just as i thought at the game it was a handball by Wiemann before he pulled it back for Benteke.
Not too suprised the ref never gave us the decision because he aint no friend of Rrrssssss ****

Never mind hand ball what about Jenna's bottling out of the header and poor marking all round hoe the **** we lost that I don't know

[Rangers77]

Woeful defending by Jenas. And Park ought to have covered the scorer. Terrible goal to concede. Still can't understand why Harry took off Fabio and played three at the back.

[gravesendhoop]

Woeful defending by Jenas. And Park ought to have covered the scorer. Terrible goal to concede. Still can't understand why Harry took off Fabio and played three at the back.

Because we were 2-1 down and desperate for a goal! Damned if you do damned if you dont! Would u prefer we shut up shop at 2-1 down?

[theblackmafia.]

Apart from scoring and c..king up for their 3rd goal I thought Jenas was innocuous, as was Park.

[Timmy the Doc]

...And Cesar should have covered the ball out of play.

[Rangers77]

Because we were 2-1 down and desperate for a goal! Damned if you do damned if you dont! Would u prefer we shut up shop at 2-1 down?

I guess so and in Harry I trust, but Clint, immense at the back, struggled when we went to three and if the change helped us get the equalizer it perhaps played its part in their winner. That's football. It's cruel. Bobby coming off on top of their goal changed the dynamic of the game.

[West Acton]

Yes without Bobby we loose his presence and the ball comes back to easily. If we stand any chance we dont only need to get him on the park each game but we need to get at least 60 to 75mins out of him

[Sotonsuperhoop]

I've never been a great lover of BZ but we are better going forward when he plays, that's why I cant understand why Harry doesn't replace him with Bothroyd. Its well documented that BZ can't last more than 45 mins so why not use JB? His goal to game ratio this season is good

[stainrodisalegend]

I've never been a great lover of BZ but we are better going forward when he plays, that's why I cant understand why Harry doesn't replace him with Bothroyd. Its well documented that BZ can't last more than 45 mins so why not use JB? His goal to game ratio this season is good

Agree. We all know Bothroyd can be frustrating but we were reduced to throwing on Mackie at the end who is just a waste of space. Bothroyd wd have allowed us to keep our shape which worked so well first half. He did well against Southampton, scored, and hasn't been seen since.

[BUSHRANGER1982]

To be fair to Jay Bothroyd, the lad didn't do much wrong when he led the line at Southampton.
He also had a cracking game in the FA Cup up at West Brom.
If Bobby Zamorra is injured, and we are in need of a player we can knock the odd ball up to, and be fairly confident he will hold the ball up, and allow more of our players to come up into play, then we can do worse than use Jay Bothroyd.