Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Why QPR are no better off under Harry Redknapp than Mark Hughes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MYU
    Administrator
    • Mar 2009
    • 43466

    #1

    Why QPR are no better off under Harry Redknapp than Mark Hughes

    Broaching the subject of Harry Redknapp in anything other than a positive light is often considered to be sacrilege by journalists. For this is Harry Houdini, the man that brought Portsmouth back from the brink and recaptured former glories at Tottenham Hotspur. (Photo: thesportreview.com) Redknapp is a media darling, there can be no doubting this, and with good reason. Few other bosses come across as jovial, approachable or friendly as he does. Yet the warm glow that the Queen’s Park … Continue reading →

    More...
  • Shania
    C Club
    • Apr 2010
    • 23696

    #2
    What can he do about infighting??
    Just my opinion.
    QPR
    Best team in the world
    Sort of

    Comment

    • acricketer
      Platinum Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 12068

      #3
      Sow's ear and silk purse comes to mind

      Comment

      • Shania
        C Club
        • Apr 2010
        • 23696

        #4
        Of which I didn´t understand anything of.
        QPR
        Best team in the world
        Sort of

        Comment

        • acricketer
          Platinum Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 12068

          #5
          "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's (female pig) ear" An old proverb meaning you can't polish a turd.

          Comment

          • MattyRangers
            Slimmer of The Year
            • Jun 2011
            • 24914

            #6
            Originally posted by acricketer
            "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's (female pig) ear" An old proverb meaning you can't polish a turd.
            But you can roll it in glitter.
            You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

            Comment

            • jmelanie
              Gold Seat
              • Aug 2011
              • 7525

              #7
              Harry is at least entertaining (either in a good way or bad). Mark Hughes was simply just boring. Got fed up with his arrogance and his excuses.

              Rangers managers have a reputation for being entertaining. Mark Hughes was as exciting as a wet fish.

              Comment

              • qblockpete
                C Club
                • Mar 2009
                • 22186

                #8
                Hughes did get us scoring end of last season, you can only hope Harry can do the same
                ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                Comment

                • Rebel R's
                  King of Pessimism
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 12266

                  #9
                  High payed players who couldn't give a **** is the problem,HR needs to stay,get rid of the lazy overpaid ****e in the summer and rebuild for a promotion push for next season,anyone who still thinks we will stay up this season is deluded.

                  Comment

                  • qprted
                    CCG
                    • May 2010
                    • 9639

                    #10
                    thats it

                    thats ridiculous harries the best manager ive ever heard
                    and theres no doubt in my mind yes he could polish a turd
                    destruction will fall upon all the teams that we meet
                    as our players vote with there feet
                    we will rise higher than eveyone and take our rightfull seat
                    we will all end up sitting on orange boxes in q block next to qpr pete
                    Last edited by qprted; 28-02-2013, 11:56 AM.
                    Click here to view my blog.

                    More...

                    Comment

                    Working...