Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

No subs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OneEyedWilly
    Silver Seat
    • Dec 2012
    • 1239

    #31
    Originally posted by ollyhoops
    I think HR was frightened of making a sub for a striker and then conceding a goal with no points.

    The game plan went really well for us, HR got it spot on but what you have to remember is that Spurs are a top team with lots of goals in them, our job was to contain them and hope for a break and too be fair we did have a few chances but SWP couldn't convert them.

    No subs was the right choice for me as we got a point.
    totally agree....if he'd changed the team up with 10 mins, we could have been 3 down by the end of the game.

    Comment

    • Rich
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 3412

      #32
      If Cisse or DJ had come on for Park and then with that body missing in midfield Spurs had scored people would be moaning. My only change would have been one of the forwards for Adel. Last 15 mins some pace up top on the counter.

      Comment

      • Yousef
        Gold Seat
        • Jul 2009
        • 9553

        #33
        It was clear Harry is trying to pick up a point. He will do the same against Man City and Man Utd. He looks like eying to win games against clubs around us and trying to pick up a point against top sides.
        QPR fan since1987

        @yousef_qpr

        Comment

        Working...