Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Did we really spend 3.5 million

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qblockpete
    C Club
    • Mar 2009
    • 22186

    #16
    I don't think anyone falls for the deal actually being 3.5 million up front, but the kid is a bit of quality we needed in midfield.
    ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
    THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

    Comment

    • m_cooper
      Silver Seat
      • Jul 2009
      • 1341

      #17
      no we did not

      Comment

      • kron-1664
        Silver Seat
        • May 2009
        • 4403

        #18
        Originally posted by qblockpete
        I don't think anyone falls for the deal actually being 3.5 million up front, but the kid is a bit of quality we needed in midfield.
        Just need some one on the end of his killer passes

        Comment

        • Olly
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 6000

          #19
          Originally posted by qblockpete
          I don't think anyone falls for the deal actually being 3.5 million up front, but the kid is a bit of quality we needed in midfield.
          the daily mail did and quoted us as being the 4th or 5th highest league spenders behind notts forest

          Comment

          • m_cooper
            Silver Seat
            • Jul 2009
            • 1341

            #20
            why is everone building him up to be the messiah as no of us have seen him play,apart from those at bristol on tues;far too early to say if he will be good or not;so it would be better if fans did not build him up to knock him down.lets just wait and see as i reckon it will take him ten games to get up to speed and adjust to the physical side of this league

            Comment

            Working...