Anton Ferdinand

[Yousef]

Not fans favourite including myself, but he must play v Stoke as they are good in corners in corners with their tall players (Crouch, Huth). I know we are poor in set pieces but Ferdinand would be better than Hill.

[Greg1882]

I disagree mate clint for me is much more the blood and guts player we need against stoke . I think clint is fine at centre half where to say Anton is a soft touch is an understatement . Just my opinion

[qprjim]

I disagree mate clint for me is much more the blood and guts player we need against stoke . I think clint is fine at centre half where to say Anton is a soft touch is an understatement . Just my opinion

Agree, Clint Hill is a lot more dominant in the air. This is the exact type of game that has Anton Ferdinand clanger written all over it.

[QPR Richard]

I also think Hill should start instead of Ferdinand. We need blood and guts players against Stoke, and I believe Hill is better suited for that type of game.

[DouDou_87]

Would have Clint in against Stoke 100%.

[pblockranger]

Did u see Ferdinand's attempt at a challenge on that Morrison for readings first goal. No me neither

[Greg1882]

Anton just looks like he's feeling sorry for himself all the time and for his build is far to easily bullied . Clint all the way

[QPR1234]

clint and nelson for me. i'd even drop bosingwa for onuoha as he is more likely to win a header than bosingwa.

[qpr]

As long as I never see Onouha in a Qpr shirt I'm happy. Truly awful player.

I would love to have seen Helguson in for this one but I'm a Bobby Zamora fan too, I hope he plays

[QPR_NW10]

what happened with Clint? Apart from him declaring he wasn't fit enough for the PL he's just been dropped? Out of all the players on the pitch I was under the assumption that he was one of our more consistent and better players in our first 5ish games.

[MattyRangers]

what happened with Clint? Apart from him declaring he wasn't fit enough for the PL he's just been dropped? Out of all the players on the pitch I was under the assumption that he was one of our more consistent and better players in our first 5ish games.

Hill has been poor this season. Granted he was played LB a lot when he isn't upto that in the PL, but even as CB he was a weak link IMO (take Norwich game for example). That said, I wouldn't mind seeing him at CB vs Stoke as he is better in the air and a lot more solid than Anton.

[Mellowhoop]

We could have a brickwall built in our goal... They will still score. Ferdinand needs to lay off the playstaition before games... Blokes a space cadet

[dave58]

Not fans favourite including myself, but he must play v Stoke as they are good in corners in corners with their tall players (Crouch, Huth). I know we are poor in set pieces but Ferdinand would be better than Hill.

Totally disagree Ferdinand is the weak link in the back four hasn't defended a corner or set piece propaly all year doesn't mark or jump would rather play Onouha at centre back seeing that is what he was when we brought him so would have Hill Onouha Bosingwa Nelson in front of A.F.

[LA Ranger]

Got to be Clint because his physical game is much stronger than Ferdinand and this game I reckon is going to be a rough house battle with very little subtlety. Afraid our midfield will be muscled out of this as well.

[Yousef]

So I believe I am on my own