Quite funny those that are having a go at Pete....

[Quaz]

exactly but magilton will be under alot of pressure from the fans and the board to play attacking football. magilton will not be in control of transfers.

we conceded two sloppy goals. he tried to sort this out. with a striker things would be different

but he dropped a striker who actually scored last week....pellicori scored in the cup game...was dropped...you know that strikers are confidnce players.....gorkks dropped.....because magilton has no faith because of the plymouth goal...or because he has to play hall?

[Sam-QPR]

You really are a clueless p rick!!!

just answer don't go to insults.

any argument you have goe's out the window when you start that rubbish

you did the same to benny earlier

[Sam-QPR]

but he dropped a striker who actually scored last week....pellicori scored in the cup game...was dropped...you know that strikers are confidnce players.....gorkks dropped.....because magilton has no faith because of the plymouth goal...or because he has to play hall?

the plymouth game wasn't exactly a great game for helguson. yes he scored maybe he should have started. but as we all know he has been unconvining for months i would rather agyemang in the starting line up.

[WeAreQPR12]

I didn't call Benny a p rick or clueless.
You responded in a patronising manner.
I don't like mentioning I played at a decent level but I say so because I think I learn't alot regarding defending in 23 years of playing.

[Sam-QPR]

I didn't call Benny a p rick or clueless.
You responded in a patronising manner.
I don't like mentioning I played at a decent level but I say so because I think I learn't alot regarding defending in 23 years of playing.

i wasn't patronising anyone.

simply asking questions. it's up to you to tell me otherwise. if i'm wrong i will admit it.

but as i see it our defense have let in two soft goals against two relegation favourites. maybe that was jim's reasoning behind. go back to the training ground and work on it.

with a goalscorer the past 3 games would have been difference. if we would have converted our chances into goals we would be on at least six points now. e all know bristol is a hard place to go to.

just seen the goal. can't blame the defense too much. it was a cracking strike

[Quaz]

the plymouth game wasn't exactly a great game for helguson. yes he scored maybe he should have started. but as we all know he has been unconvining for months i would rather agyemang in the starting line up.

agyemang....oh dear......

[Sam-QPR]

agyemang....oh dear......

like you said its all about confidence. agyemang has proved he can score in our team. i feel if we don't sign a striker then we have to get him vine and buzsacky working together again. they played well together under de canio

[Quaz]

like you said its all about confidence. agyemang has proved he can score in our team. i feel if we don't sign a striker then we have to get him vine and buzsacky working together again. they played well together under de canio

only for a short while...Magilton is not the same sort of manager.......he tinkers too much....all over the team....none of our strikers will gain any confidence if they are dropped the game after they score.....

[Sam-QPR]

took this from fez's match report

"Hall 8 - Played very well tonight I thought I'm not a Hall fan and wouldn't pick him normally but didn't realy put a foot wrong

Stewart 7 - Also played well, no real calamties both him and Hall looked comfortable in posession and dealt reasonably well with the impressive Maynard and Haynes."

[Quaz]

took this from fez's match report

"Hall 8 - Played very well tonight I thought I'm not a Hall fan and wouldn't pick him normally but didn't realy put a foot wrong

Stewart 7 - Also played well, no real calamties both him and Hall looked comfortable in posession and dealt reasonably well with the impressive Maynard and Haynes."

and your point is that they played well......last season our defence played crap in some games and still kept a clean sheet

[Sam-QPR]

and your point is that they played well......last season our defence played crap in some games and still kept a clean sheet

so whats all the fuss about dropping gorkss?

sack magilton etc

my point was not signing a forward has cost us not the choice of defense

[WeAreQPR12]

Sam sounds to me like you are a big fan of halls otherwise you would see it was a mistake dropping connelly and Gorkks

[Sam-QPR]

Sam sounds to me like you are a big fan of halls otherwise you would see it was a mistake dropping connelly and Gorkks

to me it seems like jim got it spot on. after conceding the sloppy late goal at plymouth he changed it and they didn't do much wrong.

connelly we know was not 100%.

and i think fitz plays the long ball too often but does his job well. nothing spectacular. i don't like his attitude because he seems arrogent.

why was it a mistake if they played well?

as i thought it was going forward that let us down

[qblockpete]

weraeqpr and Quaz.

Hall has been excellent this season, pop down and see a game. you might be impressed.

[Receed R]

weraeqpr and Quaz.

Hall has been excellent this season, pop down and see a game. you might be impressed.

long ball express from hall against blackpool i doubt much has changed thats how he has always played