Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SWP

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Geezum Crowe
    Apprentice
    • Jul 2012
    • 182

    #1

    SWP

    Im not in the habit of singling out particular players for criticism but can someone who saw the game explain to me what it is that SWP does? Hughes seems to favour him over Taarabt and Mackie seemingly every game.

    On the highlights of today's match it did not look like he played at all well.
  • Brian Wilson
    Silver Seat
    • Jul 2009
    • 4400

    #2
    I thought he was decent. Caused em a lot of problems

    Comment

    • dave58
      Gold Seat
      • Jan 2010
      • 5285

      #3
      Originally posted by Brian Wilson
      I thought he was decent. Caused em a lot of problems
      Agree thought him and Dyer caused them so many problems in the 1st half and think he done well for the time he was on.

      Comment

      • qprjim
        Bronze Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 948

        #4
        not to mention the amount of defensive cover he provides.
        Win or lose, on the booze

        Comment

        • mork
          Bronze Seat
          • Aug 2009
          • 634

          #5
          He played well, same as he did in scum game. Sparky replaced him with Mackie at the right time.

          Comment

          • Yousef
            Gold Seat
            • Jul 2009
            • 9553

            #6
            He is ok compaired to last season.
            QPR fan since1987

            @yousef_qpr

            Comment

            • MattyRangers
              Slimmer of The Year
              • Jun 2011
              • 24914

              #7
              Im with the OP, cant see that he provides much to a game tbh, Yes he has pace but he can barely pass a defender. Passing is shocking as well.
              You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

              Comment

              Working...