Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

The F A and John Terry

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stevesuperhoops
    Apprentice
    • Aug 2012
    • 54

    #1

    The F A and John Terry

    What has happened to this seems to have gone all quiet i was expecting him to be banned for a few games
  • Del
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 8393

    #2
    No doubt they will let it go quiet and then effectively brush it under the carpet with a pointelssly small bad of a couple of games.... probably tied in with when he's injured anyway as they wouldn't want to put him out of course, especially as Roy wants him to pay for England.

    Comment

    • QPR1234
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 5250

      #3
      last i read he was waiting for a personal hearing.
      Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
      Lovejoy: "No?!"
      Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"

      Please Follow My Twitter

      Comment

      • DeepcutHoop
        Gold Seat
        • Dec 2009
        • 6965

        #4
        I'm guessing things will be sorted after the next game.

        And by sorted, I mean Terry will be quietly cleared and we'll hear no more about it...

        Comment

        • jmelanie
          Gold Seat
          • Aug 2011
          • 7525

          #5
          John Terry, who lost the England captaincy in the fall-out from his racism court trial being delayed by Chelsea until after Euro 2012, is now having to wait for an extended period for his FA hearing.

          Comment

          • Jase
            Apprentice
            • Apr 2009
            • 208

            #6

            So basically the FA want the hearing after the gave against us so, when they inevitably brush it under the carpet there won't be any embarrassing fall-out to be seen on MOTD. Bunch of useless *****s.

            Comment

            • supahoopsaaa
              Bronze Seat
              • Aug 2011
              • 337

              #7
              You'd like to think he they'd leave him out of the visit to LR, my monies on him hobbling off in the 89th minute holding his hamstring in the Ukraine game next tuesday. If he plays against us... I cant fricking wait!
              Last edited by supahoopsaaa; 06-09-2012, 09:20 AM.

              Comment

              • bhujio
                Bronze Seat
                • Feb 2010
                • 378

                #8
                I read somewhere it is aptly timed and the hearing is end of September.

                Comment

                • Del
                  Gold Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 8393

                  #9
                  I doubt Ferdinand will be in our team for that game, opting for Mbia and Nelsen instead at the back, so that should aleviate some of the tension.

                  Comment

                  • silvercue
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4704

                    #10
                    Seeing as he has been cleared by a higher authority of racist abuse there is little that they can brush under the carpet. The FA's charge can only be about using insulting words (not racist words) which players do every game. So, if he gets a big penalty he will be able to appeal and will win as he can demonstrate precedence in numerous other incidents of this same offence..

                    FA can do hardly anything with this.
                    twitter @silvercue

                    soundcloud

                    Comment

                    • supahoopsaaa
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 337

                      #11
                      In a criminal trial it must be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

                      FA charge Has to be proved 'on the balance of probabilities'.

                      Terry has been charged by the FA for breaching rule E3 - Use of abusive and insulting words and/or behaviour which included a reference to ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race towards an opponent.

                      In court it could not be determined what exactly was said so they could not prove it beyond reasonable doubt. The FA has a lower level if 'on the balance of probabilities' they find that Terry broke the rule then I'd expect a lengthy ban.

                      Terry has admitted using the words and if he maintains it as a sarcastic reply then the FA would need to decide whether that was more probable than him calling AF what he did out of anger.

                      Comment

                      • hal9thou
                        Silver Seat
                        • May 2012
                        • 4258

                        #12
                        good summing up #11

                        still think AF was badly advised and management out of its depth on this issue.

                        Comment

                        • Busheyboy
                          Silver Seat
                          • Jul 2012
                          • 1190

                          #13
                          on the subject of the FA, Huddlestone's red card was recinded yet Shaun Derry's card was upheld at Old Trafford.
                          What's that all about?
                          I think FA stands for somethng else .... ALL

                          Comment

                          • silvercue
                            Silver Seat
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 4704

                            #14
                            Originally posted by supahoopsaaa
                            In a criminal trial it must be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

                            FA charge Has to be proved 'on the balance of probabilities'.

                            Terry has been charged by the FA for breaching rule E3 - Use of abusive and insulting words and/or behaviour which included a reference to ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race towards an opponent.

                            In court it could not be determined what exactly was said so they could not prove it beyond reasonable doubt. The FA has a lower level if 'on the balance of probabilities' they find that Terry broke the rule then I'd expect a lengthy ban.

                            Terry has admitted using the words and if he maintains it as a sarcastic reply then the FA would need to decide whether that was more probable than him calling AF what he did out of anger.
                            Makes no difference. If he is found guilty of anything that is classed as racism he will be able to sue the FA and will win. As I said, all they can get him on is abusive (not racist) remarks and precedent has been set that players are allowed to get away pretty much free on this one.

                            The FA are snookered.
                            twitter @silvercue

                            soundcloud

                            Comment

                            • Busheyboy
                              Silver Seat
                              • Jul 2012
                              • 1190

                              #15
                              I thought he did make a racist remark (which he admitted) but argued he's not racist.
                              Not quite sure what the difference is.
                              Either way, he's a high class human being from a very classy background!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...