Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Buy buy buy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hal9thou
    Silver Seat
    • May 2012
    • 4258

    #31
    I was more worried about the financial structure when stadium hysteria kicked in. Worried because I felt it highly likely that the club rather than any individual would be potentially exposed to massive liabilities - and if things went #### up on the park we could have been in a very precarious position. The fact is that we are EPL revenue dependent = we have to stay in the EPL = getting a side together to do that becomes the focus of everyone's priority. I may be wrong but I think a massive reality check has hit home, meaning that the penny has dropped: let's get a reliable unit together before anything else.

    So I think what MH has been trying to do is ensure quality cover in every position. The only way I can explain the CB thing is that a deal has been done to bring Samba over in the new year and it's a case of mix and match until then. If that hasn't happened, then you could argue that getting cover players in should maybe have been less of a priority than sorting the back two. I think Mittal involvement is the key to stability at QPR, more so than any other factor.

    Comment

    • QPR Richard
      Gold Seat
      • Sep 2011
      • 6489

      #32
      Originally posted by hal9thou
      I was more worried about the financial structure when stadium hysteria kicked in. Worried because I felt it highly likely that the club rather than any individual would be potentially exposed to massive liabilities - and if things went #### up on the park we could have been in a very precarious position. The fact is that we are EPL revenue dependent = we have to stay in the EPL = getting a side together to do that becomes the focus of everyone's priority. I may be wrong but I think a massive reality check has hit home, meaning that the penny has dropped: let's get a reliable unit together before anything else.

      So I think what MH has been trying to do is ensure quality cover in every position. The only way I can explain the CB thing is that a deal has been done to bring Samba over in the new year and it's a case of mix and match until then. If that hasn't happened, then you could argue that getting cover players in should maybe have been less of a priority than sorting the back two. I think Mittal involvement is the key to stability at QPR, more so than any other factor.
      I think the new stadium issue is completely separate from team affairs at present. My guess is the new stadium will be self-financing through sponsorship and being multi-purpose.

      The key as you say is staying in the EPL and the only way we can do that is by investment in the squad. The good thing is that we're not spending tens of millions like some other clubs are, and the board is working to a strict budget and not caving into greedy wage demands.
      Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

      Comment

      • 80sCasual
        CCG
        • Dec 2009
        • 9231

        #33
        Tony is very shrewd, just look at the Park deal and how much money he has generated from it in Asia i would say more than enough to cover Parks wages and a few others to tell you the truth. Now look at Cesar and the Brazilian interest we are gradually turning into a global brand.
        Queens Park Rangers
        NPower Champions 2010/2011

        PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)

        Comment

        • hal9thou
          Silver Seat
          • May 2012
          • 4258

          #34
          Originally posted by 80sCasual
          we are gradually turning into a global brand.
          yup, no question that has been on the agenda.

          Comment

          Working...