Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What position and formation would suit tarbs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Olly
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 6000

    #1

    What position and formation would suit tarbs?

    Seems there's a lot of disagreement about it. Should defending be more part of his game as well?
    Last edited by Olly; 20-08-2012, 11:49 AM.
  • QPR1234
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 5250

    #2
    after saturday.. i would say wide left.

    having him behind a front striker is good but he just kept coming deeper and deeper to get the ball. if he is gonna play behind cisse he needs to break into the box more and taarbs just doesnt do that.

    sadly it would only work for adel is we was away and underdogs playing counterattack.

    wide left and let him come in.
    Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
    Lovejoy: "No?!"
    Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"

    Please Follow My Twitter

    Comment

    • Jogo
      No. 10
      • Apr 2012
      • 2192

      #3
      I would say lying down on a beach somewhere.

      Just don't get the love-in with Taarabt. He's no Bowles or Marsh and never will be.

      Comment

      • Franky Boy
        Bronze Seat
        • Jul 2012
        • 877

        #4
        Put him on the right, why would you put him on the left and move hoilett so he then thinks he's done something wrong?

        Comment

        • geejaybee
          Silver Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 3377

          #5
          Originally posted by Jogo
          I would say lying down on a beach somewhere.

          Just don't get the love-in with Taarabt. He's no Bowles or Marsh and never will be.
          I'm with you on this.At best I'd use him as an impact sub.His show-boating does more harm than good and losing possession in his own half has proved costly on several occasions.

          Comment

          • tetters
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2011
            • 1031

            #6
            Originally posted by Jogo
            I would say lying down on a beach somewhere.

            Just don't get the love-in with Taarabt. He's no Bowles or Marsh and never will be.
            Originally posted by geejaybee
            I'm with you on this.At best I'd use him as an impact sub.His show-boating does more harm than good and losing possession in his own half has proved costly on several occasions.

            Comment

            • QprSinceBirth
              Silver Seat
              • Jan 2012
              • 2566

              #7
              Originally posted by tetters


              Hoilett in the hole taraabt lw. Hoilett played well there last year.

              Comment

              • qprbrisbanedivision
                Silver Seat
                • Jun 2011
                • 1338

                #8
                Please explain again why we have to shuffle our team to accomodate a player that scored so very little in the prem and did nothing of any note for us since the championship..where he was a star..

                Big fish..smal pond and all that !

                Comment

                • loftlag
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 934

                  #9
                  Originally posted by GaxZE
                  after saturday.. i would say wide left.

                  having him behind a front striker is good but he just kept coming deeper and deeper to get the ball. if he is gonna play behind cisse he needs to break into the box more and taarbs just doesnt do that.

                  sadly it would only work for adel is we was away and underdogs playing counterattack.

                  wide left and let him come in.
                  Doesn't that tell us what a shambles the m/field was he wasn't only one dropping deep in the second half Hoilet spent long periods deep

                  Comment

                  • QPR1234
                    Gold Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 5250

                    #10
                    Originally posted by loftlag
                    Doesn't that tell us what a shambles the m/field was he wasn't only one dropping deep in the second half Hoilet spent long periods deep
                    i was trying to say that he isn't an option for us behind cisse - because we need him to get into the box if cisse is only player up top.

                    adel wasn't great nor was any of the other midfielders.

                    for me its either hoillet or taarbs on the left. or at a stretch.. hoillet right taarbs left.
                    Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
                    Lovejoy: "No?!"
                    Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"

                    Please Follow My Twitter

                    Comment

                    • bmthranger
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Mar 2012
                      • 306

                      #11
                      Wouldn't have him in the starting 11.. Doesn't work hard enough and gives the ball away too cheap...mind you most of them were guilty of that Saturday...

                      Comment

                      Working...