How have QPR had a net spend of 1.5million this transfer market?

[qpr]

Mark Hughes & Tony Fernandes have both said today QPR have had a net spend of 1.5million this transfer market.

I'm blown away and extremly happy by this news but I still can't quite understand it. Can people explain their opinions on how that's happened please? Thanks

[jmelanie]

I think they are counting Samba as having signed in January, because I am sure the club paid 4-5 million. Also Hoilett has not yet been decided as it is going to a tribunal.

[NW9_RANGER]

I think they are counting Samba as having signed in January, because I am sure the club paid 4-5 million. Also Hoilett has not yet been decided as it is going to a tribunal.

yeah as above, the compensation hasnt been sorted for hoilett and diakite deal mustve been done last season

[qpr]

Fair enough. Cheers

[IsleworthRanger]

I bet all the agent fees involved have at least trebled the figure quoted

[klonk]

could be that we paid a big chunk of the diakite transfer-fee as a loan-fee back in january and that only a relatively small balance needed to be paid over the summer, also could be that the full fee is dependent on us staying up (i read somewhere that Park's fee of £2m rises quite a bit if we do).

anyone know how much we got for heidar? i'm guessing we got about £500k for paddy

[Ginger Ninja]

dont forget we got rid of vine, aggy, hall etc etc so thats freed up a lot of wage money.

[QPR Richard]

Well, however it's been done it's been done superbly.

[qpr]

I had another idea, someone said we sold £12m Park shirts

[QPR71]

12m for a shirt!

[qpr]

12m for a shirt!

Well he is as big as David Beckham in his prime