Beckford

[qpr-buzsaky]

but didn't bates just get £8m for Delph, im sure that he will accept £2m-£2.5m now he has money

but does anyone itk know if we're in discussions or if it is just an "interest"?

[m_cooper]

if you are using that logic,beckford would be 10m plus as he has a higher rating than delph who is just a kid

[Morris]

Delph has far more potential though, thats why his price tag was high.

[m_cooper]

has potential,is a serious risk;beckford would not be a risk hence the price he will go for.i will eat humble pie if he goes for less than 3m and wolves are after him which will drive the price up

[Morris]

I doubt he will go for £3m.

But I agree he wouldnt be much of a risk and we should defo sign him, wont happen though!

[m_cooper]

no,not if our board are true to their colours;it would be a shock if they spent more than 1.5m on anyone

[qpr-buzsaky]

i think that Magilton has his head screwed on aobut such matters, he knows what we need now (hopefully) he knows these leagues and i think he knows after today where we need to strengthen

“We kept going and if we continue to play like that I think we'll win more than we lose. We've just got to take the opportunities when they come along.”

this shows he knows we were poor in front of goal today and he is not turning a blind eye to it, he also said that we may bring in a few players and QBP did say we were interested so, im praying we can pull it off

does anybody have info on it?

[m_cooper]

the price is much too high for us

[90minutes]

yet we spent a fair bit on faulin. where he fits in i dont know.. surely the money would have been better spent on a striker.

[m_cooper]

forget the apparent faurlin fee as it was not 3.5m,if that was the case we would have spent it on a much better tried and trusted player,it would not make any sense paying that kind of money on a risk,as he could turn out not to be any good at this level