Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Bob Pollock

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MadDog
    Apprentice
    • Mar 2011
    • 37

    #1

    Bob Pollock

    Better hope we stay up I'd imagine there will be legal action from the club either against the individual or the Premier League for the non award of Clint Hills clear goal. We should be on 38 points safe with Bolton on 33 and gone already as the correct result of that match should have been 2-2. Would be a travesty if we went down tbh
  • qpr93
    Bronze Seat
    • Feb 2011
    • 484

    #2
    Get over it, blackburn had a clear pen tonight doesn't mean they are gonna sue

    Comment

    • Norths
      CCG
      • Jan 2011
      • 13067

      #3
      Originally posted by qpr93
      Get over it, blackburn had a clear pen tonight doesn't mean they are gonna sue
      Getting a penalty doesnt equal an automatic goal whereas we SCORED

      Comment

      • 80sCasual
        CCG
        • Dec 2009
        • 9231

        #4
        Originally posted by MadDog
        Better hope we stay up I'd imagine there will be legal action from the club either against the individual or the Premier League for the non award of Clint Hills clear goal. We should be on 38 points safe with Bolton on 33 and gone already as the correct result of that match should have been 2-2. Would be a travesty if we went down tbh
        Doesn't mean the score would have stayed at 2-2. Us or them could have gone on to snatch a late winner. Awarding the goal could have changed the momentum.
        Queens Park Rangers
        NPower Champions 2010/2011

        PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)

        Comment

        • rickyranger
          Silver Seat
          • Jul 2009
          • 1791

          #5
          Said it before the club should at least say they will consider legal action for loss of revenue if we go down. At the very least reintroduce the issue into the media will get both the refs and the FA thinking ahead of the final games.

          Fact is we were cheated and Pollock saying he could not see because there were two players blocking his view has been proved incorrect by TV so he has left himself a little open on that point.

          Comment

          • QPR_NW10
            Silver Seat
            • May 2011
            • 2659

            #6
            Originally posted by rickyranger
            Said it before the club should at least say they will consider legal action for loss of revenue if we go down. At the very least reintroduce the issue into the media will get both the refs and the FA thinking ahead of the final games.

            Fact is we were cheated and Pollock saying he could not see because there were two players blocking his view has been proved incorrect by TV so he has left himself a little open on that point.
            if this gets reintroduced into the media we will be a laughing stock. remember the bitterness towards NW at S.utd when he was claiming the whole Tevez thing was the reason why they were relegated?
            we're where we are because of results.
            i fully agree we need goal line technology - not some silly court case once we're relegated 3 months after the event.

            Comment

            Working...