-
-
I know you're not a big fan of his but you either didn't read the 'article' (if that's what you can call anything written by that toilet paper) or you're taking a leaf out of their book with a 'get people's attention' headline. A more apt title for what adel said would be: Adel says that qpr would have got more point with 11 men on pitch because going down to 10 makes it more difficult. That's boring but true. No one can disagree with that. -
Typical Sun reporting - You've cost us points and blasted team mates nowhere in quotes at all.
Quotes he (apparently) said don't even mention the above and are not wrong, just saying what happened (if indeed he did even say anything at all).
Lazy journalism, we are easy pickings at the moment but this only causes rifts.Queens Park Rangers
NPower Champions 2010/2011
PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)Comment
-
I read it mate. the report in the independant is much better and more accurate.
Just seems to have got himself into a silly(?) position and i know its taken out of context.
nothing to do with not being a fan. I'd just like to think he's smart enough not to get himself into this position.
icf the headlione had said swp blasts...etc ..it would have even been worht printing. Was just posting a link for those interested.Comment
-
jesus christ my spelling is shite !!Comment
-
He's got a point, if we had kept 11 men on the pitch in the Norwich and Wolves games we would have 6 more than we do now- and Wolves would almost certainly be down. For me that is still the result that will define our season.
The reds in the Bolton, Villa and Sunderland games didn't make a difference to the result.Comment
-
Same words, different spin
Rule #1 Never (ever) trust those fnckers from the mediaComment
Comment