Mackie at RB is a good call
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
My starting XI against Blackburn
Collapse
X
-
Yep, totally agree with what others have said about Mackie at right back.
Leaves Onuaha and Ferdinand to resume their Centre Back partnership.
I for one would rather have Mackie in the back four than both Hall and Gabbidon! Makes us more solid.
Come on You Rr's!!!Comment
-
I can see the arguement for having Mackie at RB; but IMO, he would get roasted by Hoillet. Mackie isnt a defender and, for all his effort and energy he would give us, we need a defender with proper defensive capabilities to contain Hoilett, hes a very useful player.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.Comment
-
thinking again..
id rather go for:
kenny
onouha - hill - ferdinand - taiwo
taarabt - barton - buz/derry - traore
zamora - helgusonSoldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My TwitterComment
-
This will be the team -
Kenny
Onouha Ferdinand Gabbidon Taiwo
SWP Barton Buszaky Traore
Taarabt
Zamora
If Gabbidon doen't make it through his fitness test Hall will start22nd February away v Charlton is the 40th Anniversary of my support of QPR and my first game. Away v Chelsea 3-3 23rd Feb 1974. 40 years of pure magic!!Comment
-
Huge Game and one we must not lose. Granted Mackie was a useful RB in a few championship games. But to put him at RB having not played there all season against a Prem Player like Hoilett is madness! He will get torn a new one. Onuha is a RB. Hall and Gabidon can do a job with Ferdinand.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment