On the wind up again? Or dud info?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
I thought Facto said only 8m to spend?
Collapse
X
-
-
That was an accurate statement at the time but events change the course of history. Nedum Onuoha who was a NW target and was a done deal with only the t’s to be crossed and the i's to be dotted. But he was a loan deal and would have been but for AF doing his knee in. That caused a change ( and delays in getting the cost and loan turned into a buy ) in plans due to restrictions on two loans so the dynamics of the targets who they thought they would buy and those on loan changed. The rest is history.Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomenComment
-
-
Comment
-
Absolute toshThat was an accurate statement at the time but events change the course of history. Nedum Onuoha who was a NW target and was a done deal with only the t’s to be crossed and the i's to be dotted. But he was a loan deal and would have been but for AF doing his knee in. That caused a change ( and delays in getting the cost and loan turned into a buy ) in plans due to restrictions on two loans so the dynamics of the targets who they thought they would buy and those on loan changed. The rest is history.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
add the sums up......no calculator required!!.......money in offsets money out=8m total!you know nothing john snow!!!!Comment
-
You may want to elaborate because it is you that don't know what you are on a about. AF's injury changed the options and the plan agreed.
Of course if you don't what to hear facts that's fine but if you are going to knock something then explain. Or better still check with his agent. Then come back and shoot it down if it is not a fact.Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomenComment
Comment