Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Without A Named Striker.. Over 46 Games

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mutley

    #16
    not enough

    Comment

    • kingy10
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 1629

      #17
      Why would it be any better than last year? We've lost our top scorer and gained er nobody....
      :drunk:

      Comment

      • sirpiechucker
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 5079

        #18
        Originally posted by kingy10
        Why would it be any better than last year? We've lost our top scorer and gained er nobody....
        We've gained Vine, Buzsaky, Rowlands, Tabaart and Agyemang. All of who we had little or nothing of last season.

        Comment

        • MYU
          Administrator
          • Mar 2009
          • 43466

          #19
          Originally posted by Captain Planet
          Anything above 70 is not gonna happen. No way we'll equal Wolves goal tally for last season.

          We've never been a high scoring team in this division so I'd say low 50s. I'll go with 53.
          I'm with the Captain on this one.

          Comment

          • qblockpete
            C Club
            • Mar 2009
            • 22186

            #20
            second thoughts anyone?
            ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
            THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

            Comment

            • Stanley
              Guest
              • Mar 2009
              • 23693

              #21
              talk about resurrection! lol!

              Comment

              Working...