Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Qpr Bid for pienaar

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mellowhoop
    Gold Seat
    • Apr 2010
    • 5698

    #1

    Qpr Bid for pienaar

    According to sky sports
    http://twitter.com/Mellowhoop
  • maccatwo
    Silver Seat
    • Feb 2010
    • 2404

    #2
    Is he any good

    Comment

    • qpr4life
      Gold Seat
      • Apr 2009
      • 5044

      #3
      Course he is, great player... a real step up for us!!

      Comment

      • qpr4life
        Gold Seat
        • Apr 2009
        • 5044

        #4
        In actual fact, I think he may provide the link and quality we lack currently.

        I sometimes feel that the reason we score less is because we missed Adel and the strikers have had no supply...

        Comment

        • bluehoopa
          Apprentice
          • Mar 2009
          • 231

          #5
          spurs have turned it down flat!!

          Comment

          • paulmason
            Banned
            • Mar 2009
            • 7443

            #6
            Originally posted by qpr4life
            I sometimes feel that the reason we score less is because we missed Adel and the strikers have had no supply...
            So the fact our strikers are old or slow or both and play with their backs to the goal, has nothing to do with it ?

            Comment

            • qpr4life
              Gold Seat
              • Apr 2009
              • 5044

              #7
              Originally posted by paulmason
              So the fact our strikers are old or slow or both and play with their backs to the goal, has nothing to do with it ?
              I think your wrong, and I find this post slightly narrow minded...

              Its frustrating this, yes our strikers have struggled to find the net, however the supply has been limited.

              We work the ball well etc but dont get it into the right spots.

              1. Helguson has managed to score more than ANYONE thought he would
              2. DJ - Out injured, not a run of games
              3. JB - He should have scored more, he is good, has the talent, give him a ****ing break

              Comment

              • Mellowhoop
                Gold Seat
                • Apr 2010
                • 5698

                #8
                Paul is right IMO...
                http://twitter.com/Mellowhoop

                Comment

                • paulmason
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 7443

                  #9
                  Originally posted by qpr4life
                  I think your wrong, and I find this post slightly narrow minded...

                  Its frustrating this, yes our strikers have struggled to find the net, however the supply has been limited.

                  We work the ball well etc but dont get it into the right spots.

                  1. Helguson has managed to score more than ANYONE thought he would
                  2. DJ - Out injured, not a run of games
                  3. JB - He should have scored more, he is good, has the talent, give him a ****ing break

                  1. Helguson has managed to score more than ANYONE thought he would
                  Analyse his goals. I cant remember him doping the shoulder to get past a defender then drilling it into the corner and as much as Mackie would be a good last 20 minutes player, so is HH for the long balls into the box for him to get his head on. Headers, tap ins and pens.

                  2. DJ - Out injured, not a run of games
                  When he was fit, NW preferred HH and/or Bothroyd

                  3. JB - He should have scored more, he is good, has the talent, give him a ****ing break
                  JB should have been taken of at half time v Newcastle and never given a shirt again. If that had happened, I think we would have had 6-8 more points.

                  Its all about opinions though.
                  Last edited by paulmason; 13-01-2012, 11:52 AM.

                  Comment

                  • qpr4life
                    Gold Seat
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 5044

                    #10
                    Originally posted by paulmason
                    1. Helguson has managed to score more than ANYONE thought he would
                    Analyse his goals. I cant remember him doping the shoulder to get past a defender then drilling it into the corner and as much as Mackie would be a good last 20 minutes player, so is HH for the long balls into the box for him to get his head on. Headers, tap ins and pens.

                    2. DJ - Out injured, not a run of games
                    When he was fit, NW's choice preferred HH and/or Bothroyd

                    3. JB - He should have scored more, he is good, has the talent, give him a ****ing break
                    JB should have been taken of at half time v Newcastle and never given a shirt again. If that had happened, I think we would have had 6-8 more points.

                    Its all about opinions though.
                    Fair dooze, good answers in all honesty...

                    By only problem...

                    Helguson was SH1T at first, now look at the guy, does a sterling job IMO... hes a target man and that is it...

                    Could DJ and JB find the form we want...?? And if so would you opinion change... YES

                    Comment

                    • paulmason
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 7443

                      #11
                      Originally posted by qpr4life
                      Fair dooze, good answers in all honesty...

                      By only problem...

                      Helguson was SH1T at first, now look at the guy, does a sterling job IMO... hes a target man and that is it...

                      Could DJ and JB find the form we want...?? And if so would you opinion change... YES
                      Everything regarding the way we play will now change and I am just hoping we get the ball out wide quicker, then into the area for strikers (who ever they are) to attack, instead of lumping it long to be held up.

                      Comment

                      • qpr4life
                        Gold Seat
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 5044

                        #12
                        Originally posted by paulmason
                        Everything regarding the way we play will now change and I am just hoping we get the ball out wide quicker, then into the area for strikers (who ever they are) to attack, instead of lumping it long to be held up.
                        So you agree that the way we have been playing hasnt been providing the right service for 'ANY SORT OF ATTACKER?'

                        Comment

                        Working...