22 Matches In Charge

[qblockpete]

just to mix it a little.
01 Lee Camp
14 Martin Rowlands
05 Damion Stewart
33 Martin Cranie
03 Chris Barker
11 Gareth Ainsworth
07 Adam Bolder
32 Mikele Leigertwood
25 Hogan Ephraim
17 Ben Sahar
26 Rowan Vine

Subs
12 Jake Cole
27 Sampsa Timoska
02 Marcus Bignot
16 Jason Jarrett
18 Stefan Moore

[qblockpete]

sirpiechecker.

De Canio did not have a good team until January !!

[sirpiechucker]

sirpiechecker.

De Canio did not have a good team until January !!

Remind me when Vine and Buzsaky joined the club?

[qblockpete]

2 players don't make a team.

Look at our bench now compared to then. Agree Sahar is probably the same as De Carmine, but the rest of squad was not up to scratch.


When did Vine come?

[Hooped67]

October 2007

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/q/qpr/7082892.stm

[sirpiechucker]

This is De Canio's first match in charge:

http://www.soccerbase.com/results3.sd?gameid=533854

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Cranie ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Ephraim ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Vine (Nardiello ,89 ) ,Nygaard (Bolder ,81)
Subs not used: Cole,Timoska,

Sorry Pete but not sure where you've got your team from??? Ben Sahar played only three times under De Canio. This is a striker that has 14 caps and 3 goals for his country and isn't yet 20. Just because he failed with us does it make him bad? Is Shevchenko bad because he failed at Chelsea? Or Morienties or Kluivert or Forlan because they failed for one team once?

[sirpiechucker]

October 2007

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...pr/7082892.stm

He scored on debut against Colchester a month before De Canio became manager. Buzsaky signed in September - 6 weeks before De Canio started.

[writtler]

Sorry to tread on your toes piemaster but getting bored with the let's compare Di Canio's last 22 to Sousa's first 22 games excuse so here goes:-

Sousa - 25 Nov 08 (1st Match in Charge) - 21 Mar 09 (22nd Match in Charge)

P22, W7, D10, L5 - Pts 31

Di Canio

P22, W9, D7, L6 Pts 34

Not much in it

Next....

[sirpiechucker]

Sorry to tread on your toes piemaster but getting bored with the let's compare Di Canio's last 22 to Sousa's first 22 games excuse so here goes:-

Sousa - 25 Nov 08 (1st Match in Charge) - 21 Mar 09 (22nd Match in Charge)

P22, W7, D10, L5 - Pts 31

Di Canio

P22, W9, D7, L6 Pts 34

Not much in it

Next....

No probs writtler!

There you go Pete use those 3 precious points as an argument for sacking Sousa. Truth is there is very little difference. De Canio is in the past and Sousa is the manager now.

[NewCrossHoop]

Exactly, not much difference between them all including Dowie, We will need better points per game ratio if we want promotion though

[qblockpete]

3 points is alot !

[QPRMendoza]

3 points is alot !

Roughly about 2.2% of what it takes to make the playoffs. :what:

[Dazzer1977]

A few more FACTS to add to this arguement!!!

1) If De Canio wasn't caught with his pants down then may be he'd still be our manager.

2) If Flabio never tinkered with Dowie's team selection then we'd be a better team. It was his full team selection upto the Derby game and then FAT BOY stuck his nose in. I will add up to that point we looked a very strong Championship side and the result against Derby was completely against the run of play! The Swansea performance because FLABBIO stuck his ore in and Dowie got the blame so he walked - FACT!

How do you like them apples!!! :super_man: