A good manager, but with limitations (Michael Hann, The Guardian)

[Westbyfleetr]

Well worth reading. Actually saw the incident Hann refers to against Norwich. Hill came over to the touchline and could clearly be seen demanding / pleading Warnock do something.

Right beneath the Directors Box. Could be heard loud and clear.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/jan/09/neil-warnock-loved-qpr?CMP=twt_gu

[Shrine]

great article

[coneysboots]

Good read, and pretty much spot on.

[vblockranger]

"He's the Routeledge of managers" from one of the comments to the piece..that one made me lol :-)

[QPRDROG]

Very good read that unfortunately for Warnock seems to be the truth. Our set pieces have always been shocking and we never had a plan b. Neil done an a amazing job to keep us up and then get us promoted but it was time for a change. Hopefully we get in the right man.

[Dale]

Great article

That rabbit-in-the-headlights approach to strategy had become a feature at QPR. Why was Warnock picking only one striker at home, for a team struggling to score? Why were players being used out of position? Why was the willing but limited Jamie Mackie being used on the right wing instead of Shaun Wright-Phillips? Why was Adel Taarabt frozen out of the team for much of late autumn, when – for all the problems with him – he was the only midfielder capable of offering creativity to the team?

Spot on

[winalotto]

Fantastic piece and i think sums up Warnock very well. Was speaking to someone saturday involved in the game and he said that Neil needed a new coach to work along side him and maybe not surrounding himself with yes men,interesting comments after reading that.

[californiahoop]

Just posted that link also, yep, nail and head come to mind.

[Olly]

So maybe that explains why he was never head-hunted for the prem during his career.

[gator]

NorfolkHoops gets some mention! Good article and Hill was spot on, I guess NW gambled that we might win that match with 10 men!