Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Yet another Warnock out thread!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ahR
    Silver Seat
    • Nov 2009
    • 1800

    #61
    hard to disagree big fella....

    Originally posted by rickyranger
    Needs to go and now, irrelevant of the sending off (which seemed very harsh) we started poorly.

    The continued obsession with Mackie and Derry is beyond me, Barton was excellent in central midfield against Arsenal and Mackie did nothing in that game to warrant his place. Think SWP showed in the second half why he should be playing.

    As for the Tarrabt substitution it actually begs belief that loosing 2-1 you take off your biggest attacking threat.

    Half way through the second half despite playing 10 men Norwich were actually under a bit of pressure. Lambert made three changes and went three at the back to try to win the game and low and behold they got their second goal, would Warnock have done that, not a chance.

    Being saying for weeks and other threads the managers job is to make the team better than its individual parts Warnock actually makes good players average. Just think back to how well we played in the first few games after the signings, couple of weeks with Warnock and they have gone backwards.

    Comment

    • Stanley
      Guest
      • Mar 2009
      • 23693

      #62
      Originally posted by rickyranger
      Needs to go and now, irrelevant of the sending off (which seemed very harsh) we started poorly.

      The continued obsession with Mackie and Derry is beyond me, Barton was excellent in central midfield against Arsenal and Mackie did nothing in that game to warrant his place. Think SWP showed in the second half why he should be playing.

      As for the Tarrabt substitution it actually begs belief that loosing 2-1 you take off your biggest attacking threat.

      Half way through the second half despite playing 10 men Norwich were actually under a bit of pressure. Lambert made three changes and went three at the back to try to win the game and low and behold they got their second goal, would Warnock have done that, not a chance.

      Being saying for weeks and other threads the managers job is to make the team better than its individual parts Warnock actually makes good players average. Just think back to how well we played in the first few games after the signings, couple of weeks with Warnock and they have gone backwards.
      Thats all very fine and dandy, except you conveniently fail to mention (due to an incorrect red card) that we were playing with 10 men, which would affect any team. We were 1-0 up before that.
      Last edited by Stanley; 02-01-2012, 09:31 PM.

      Comment

      • rickyranger
        Silver Seat
        • Jul 2009
        • 1791

        #63
        Originally posted by Stanley76
        Thats all very fine and dandy, except you conveniently fail to mention (due to an incorrect red card) that we were playing with 10 men, which would affect any team. We were 1-0 up before that.
        Yes we were 1 up and may have won if not for the sendin off but would that have made the selection of Mackie over SWP right or the Derry selection at the expense of a second striker. Just maybe with the right team from the start the sending off may not have happened we will never know.

        What we do know is that he got his initial selection wrong then took off our biggest threat when we needed a goal, please explain that one.

        Comment

        • James1979
          Silver Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 4857

          #64
          I'm firmly on the fence with this one and will leave it to fernandes as I trust him. If we were just looking at results then I would definitely want him to stay but calling our young left back a disgrace and the handling of adel, barton and seemingly glorifying mackie has really annoyed me. So, am on the fence. I would say that you shouldn't look at one or two games. Do you think over the course of the season we will stay up? Red cards tc are irrelevant. The table doesn't lie. I would be happy with our current position though. Under no circumstances should he be given whole season just because he took us up. Too much sentamentality, I want qpr in premiership.

          Comment

          • Stanley
            Guest
            • Mar 2009
            • 23693

            #65
            Originally posted by rickyranger
            Yes we were 1 up and may have won if not for the sendin off but would that have made the selection of Mackie over SWP right or the Derry selection at the expense of a second striker. Just maybe with the right team from the start the sending off may not have happened we will never know.

            What we do know is that he got his initial selection wrong then took off our biggest threat when we needed a goal, please explain that one.
            I can't explain it because I completely agree with you.

            Whats undeniable however is the fact that we were 1-0 up and pretty much in control of the game before the game-changing mistake by the ref.

            Comment

            • Brian Wilson
              Silver Seat
              • Jul 2009
              • 4400

              #66
              Originally posted by Rebel R's
              Can I just put YOU straight on one thing once and for all(call me an f@@king this that and another)BUT don't say I enjoy it when my team lose,I have supported them for 40 years and to say that is plain stupid !
              You definitely enjoy it at least a little bit though you may be in denial.

              Comment

              • paulmason
                Banned
                • Mar 2009
                • 7443

                #67
                Originally posted by Quaz
                Is the season over for you now sweet cheeks, or are you revelling in the misery.

                We have a run of wins could be back up the table again eh dope.
                You really are a plum and as you never go to games, how your opinion is valid is beyond me.

                Comment

                • silvercue
                  Silver Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 4704

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Stanley76
                  Thats all very fine and dandy, except you conveniently fail to mention (due to an incorrect red card) that we were playing with 10 men, which would affect any team. We were 1-0 up before that.
                  Didn't effect Wolves against Arsenal and IIRC Chelsea played us off the park with 9 second half. The sending off is not why people are questioning Warnock - it is his blind loyalty to players that are not good enough in this league and his inabilit yto compete tactically with his peers.
                  twitter @silvercue

                  soundcloud

                  Comment

                  • IsleworthRanger
                    CCG
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 7090

                    #69
                    Originally posted by paulmason
                    You really are a plum and as you never go to games, how your opinion is valid is beyond me.
                    I have no idea if Quaz goes to games or not but should it really matter and is he not entitled to his opinion?

                    Comment

                    • Yousef
                      Gold Seat
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 9553

                      #70
                      Our squad looks better in terms of quality and experience in the PL compared to Norwich and Swansea, but yet we struggle due to NW's continuous mistakes:
                      1. Playing players out of positions (SWP & Traore).
                      2. Favouring some players (Mackie and Derry).
                      QPR fan since1987

                      @yousef_qpr

                      Comment

                      • Rebel R's
                        King of Pessimism
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 12266

                        #71
                        I received a one years Ban with no reason given yesterday evening,I'm assuming because I started this thread(nothing in the rules about being negative),only to be reinstated 2 hours later with an unidentified mod claiming it was a mistake.I am in no doubt it was a warning for to stop going on about Warnock,at least I know now should I be banned again there are many more on this board who will voice their feelings on him,as for me,I stand firm,Warnock if left in charge will mean Relagation.

                        Comment

                        • rangerforevereastcote
                          Silver Seat
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 4144

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Rebel R's
                          I received a one years Ban with no reason given yesterday evening,I'm assuming because I started this thread(nothing in the rules about being negative),only to be reinstated 2 hours later with an unidentified mod claiming it was a mistake.I am in no doubt it was a warning for to stop going on about Warnock,at least I know now should I be banned again there are many more on this board who will voice their feelings on him,as for me,I stand firm,Warnock if left in charge will mean Relagation.
                          Maybe give benefit
                          Of doubt there rebel I have been as vociferous and not
                          Had anything

                          Comment

                          • Gtleighsr3
                            CCG
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 23569

                            #73
                            a rebel rebel
                            Chelmsford City the home of Radio

                            Comment

                            Working...