Bringing on Clint Hill 10 minutes to go??

[rangerforevereastcote]

Young, despite being a full back, is a far more sensible choice at CB than those we had on the bench yesterday meaning Orr had to come on.

point being young is an effective rb that helps in attack considerably , taking him away made us ineffective down the right ffs how any throw in /crossing situations did we fk up after young went in the middle?

[Norths]

point being young is an effective rb that helps in attack considerably , taking him away made us ineffective down the right ffs how any throw in /crossing situations did we fk up after young went in the middle?

Could have been far worse than what it was, warnock made the decision and went with it.

[QPR DEVON]

Could have been far worse than what it was, warnock made the decision and went with it.

and made our chances of getting anything out of the game harder. good management for bradders but poor management for QPR

[rangerforevereastcote]

Could have been far worse than what it was, warnock made the decision and went with it.

and yet again made the wrong one, similar vs city where jay terrorising city he took him off , i cant barring the miller sub last year think of one time he has made an impact with his substitutions

[Shania]

Spot on ! it was an attacking move

He also brought on DJ. That helped as well.
Hopefully we will not sit so deep from the start against Man UTD but make them sweat all over the park.

[rangertillidiedan]

yes i did watch. it was disgraceful because he brought orr on so he got a chance to play at anfield, rather than use the TWO centre backs he had on the bench. warnock effectively gave up on the game at that point.

Who said he brought on Orr so he got a chance to play an Anfield? That's absolute bullsh!t. What is your source for this? Any evidence or are you just making it up?

We had Connolly on the bench who hasn't played in ages. Not sure where you get these TWO CBs from. Hill hasn't played there for a while. He gave up on the game in what way?

[Tarbie]

Who said he brought on Orr so he got a chance to play an Anfield? That's absolute bullsh!t. What is your source for this? Any evidence or are you just making it up?

We had Connolly on the bench who hasn't played in ages. Not sure where you get these TWO CBs from. Hill hasn't played there for a while. He gave up on the game in what way?

What he said!

I was actually crying out for this sub to be made from half time onwards. We looked so devoid of any ideas or pace in the attacking third that it made sense to bring on Hill and push Traore further up the pitch.

As for only playing Orr because he is a Liverpool fan, come on guys, that is just ridiculous. Warnock made a decision based on who he felt the best option was. Ferdinand was injured, Connolly hasn't kicked a ball in months so the obvious choice was to bring on Orr and movie Young to centre half.