FAO Scott Jones

[Connell10]

Nannies wont allow anything like that on here.

if they dont allow it to be put up then im sorry thats a disgrace!

[Kirill]

Only children who can't/won't open his precious blog need nannies

http://qprr.co.uk/

Just click on it, it is easy

[IsleworthRanger]

if they dont allow it to be put up then im sorry thats a disgrace!

Of course it will be allowed as a MOD has always clearly stated and requested

[Kirill]

"Hopefully, it will shun some light..."
Talk about Freudian slips

[SullivanQPR]

if they dont allow it to be put up then im sorry thats a disgrace!

Calm yourself down.
Tell you what, you can post this masterpiece up here yourself if you're THAT angry & bothered!

[paulmason]

It doesn't matter what the nannies say, WATRB has always been a pro Paladini message board and was the reason why it was openly mocked on other forums and we will see soon if that is still the case.

[IsleworthRanger]

It doesn't matter what the nannies say, WATRB has always been a pro Paladini message board and was the reason why it was openly mocked on other forums and we will see soon if that is still the case.

And yet you feel compelled to post everyday to make every poster on here see the light I suppose?

[paulmason]

And yet you feel compelled to post everyday to make every poster on here see the light I suppose?

I post on here because I like it, for me its the best forum and I don't really give a toss if something is pro or anti. I do find it funny when people say it was not pro Paladini though, as I have never seen a thread deleted or closed down or moved, when it was saying how good GP was.

[qprbrisbanedivision]

f-me.how can you argue about something so boring...for so long....

bet you lot are a right laugh in the pub!!

[Kirill]

I post on here because I like it, for me its the best forum and I don't really give a toss if something is pro or anti. I do find it funny when people say it was not pro Paladini though, as I have never seen a thread deleted or closed down or moved, when it was saying how good GP was.

Well, Paul, you also won't see a thread deleted or closed down when it says how good you are
But if it said that you were an ars*hole of humongous proportions, we would not just leave it here

[IsleworthRanger]

I post on here because I like it, for me its the best forum and I don't really give a toss if something is pro or anti. I do find it funny when people say it was not pro though as I have never seen a thread deleted or closed when it was saying how good GP was.

To be totally honest though I have always thought that the majority of this sites posters have in the main always been anti Paladini

You appear to be clinging on to the fact that an ex owner of the site was openly pro Paladini and ignoring that most spent the whole day arguing with him about it

For what its worth I have always strongly disagreed with threads being locked or deleted in tha past as healthy debate is always enjoyable to read and personally I would not have banned some of the posters who are no longer with us on here

[SullivanQPR]

It doesn't matter what the nannies say, WATRB has always been a pro Paladini message board and was the reason why it was openly mocked on other forums and we will see soon if that is still the case.

That may be how it was seen.
Mainly because the ex-owner of this site was always quick to get into any debate about GP and defend him.
That was his call and his right. But even though he's not the site owner anymore, or even involved, the rest of the "nannies" have to put up with daft generalisations, and probably will do for a whileI suppose.

[LoftusRoadLad]

Wait for the book...or the movie !!

[paulmason]

To be totally honest though I have always thought that the majority of this sites posters have in the main always been anti Paladini

You appear to be clinging on to the fact that an ex owner of the site was openly pro Paladini and ignoring that most spent the whole day arguing with him about it

For what its worth I have always strongly disagreed with threads being locked or deleted in tha past as healthy debate is always enjoyable to read and personally I would not have banned some of the posters who are no longer with us on here

Not clinging to anything, just saying it as I see it as I don't care either way, but you cant have it both ways. If someone who was banned for personal reasons, by Pete, someone who is no longer involved in the web site, what are they not un-banned as the reasons why they were banned are no longer valid ?

[IsleworthRanger]

Not clinging to anything, just saying it as I see it as I don't care either way, but you cant have it both ways. If someone who was banned for personal reasons, by someone who is no longer involved in the web site, what are they not un-banned as the reason why they were banned are no longer valid ?

As it happens I could not agree more except for those who made threats etc